In 1603 James built three new ships for the Navy, and five years
later the _Ark Royal_ of Elizabeth’s reign was rebuilt and renamed
the _Anne Royal_. In 1608 the keel was laid for the _Prince Royal_,
a ship of 1200 tons, whose appearance will be found in Fig. 60.
This illustration is from a picture in the Trinity House, and is
here reproduced by kind permission of the Elder Brethren. She was
the largest and finest ship that had ever been designed for the
English Navy, and was the finest man-of-war of her time. She was
both built and designed under the supervision of Phineas Pett,
Master of Arts of Emmanuel College, Cambridge, a distinguished
member of a distinguished family which, from the reign of Henry
VIII. right down to William and Mary kept up a continuous line of
naval builders and architects. An unsuccessful attempt was made to
launch her on September 24, 1610, when it was found that the dock
head at Woolwich was too narrow to allow her to get through. She
was eventually launched successfully, however, at a later date. She
was a three-decker in the sense that she had two full batteries
and an upper deck armed. Gorgeously decorated with carvings and
paintings the _Prince Royal_ was double-planked, and with but slight
modifications, chiefly in respect of her decoration, would not be
dissimilar to the ships built at the beginning of the nineteenth
century. Indeed so slight, comparatively, were the developments that
took place between this and the time of the Battle of Trafalgar that
the ships of the early Stuarts would not have looked out of place
among the ships of Nelson’s fleet. Between now and the close of the
eighteenth century the similarity between men-of-war and merchantmen
was so close as to make distinction practically impossible. That,
too, will account for the fact of the English in the foregoing
imaginary encounter by Smith asking whether the Spanish vessel were a
merchant or man-of-war. We have made so many changes between the two
classes of ships since then that it is a little difficult at first to
realise this.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account