In the Greenwich model she is seen as a sailing ship pure and
simple, with three decks. As to her rigging I have had the pleasure
of talking with more than one of those who served in this, the
first three-decker that was launched during the reign of Victoria.
One of the first points that strikes one is that the _Queen_ is
seen to have relinquished the historic hempen cable for the chain.
The rounded bow instead of the square shape already alluded to is
immediately obvious. The yard of the spritsail athwart the bowsprit
still remains, although this sail remained longer in the merchant
service than in the Navy, being used but rarely in the latter at
this late period. She possesses a bowsprit in three parts, _i.e._,
bowsprit proper, jib-boom and flying-boom. To encounter the downward
strain the ship by now has also a dolphin-striker. The _Queen_
carried stun’sails (studding-sails) of course, square in shape,
which were often weighted down by shot at the outboard end. Many
merchant ships of that time, however, had them cut not square but
triangular, and these were then set, not as the modern yacht sets
her spinnaker with the apex of the triangle at the top, but at the
bottom. In the edition of “Falconer’s Marine Dictionary” revised
by Burney, and published three years before the _Queen_ was laid
down, he speaks of and illustrates stun’sails only for the courses,
topsails, and t’gallant sails. Royal studding sails most probably
never were seen, although I notice that E. W. Cooke, R.A., whose
life was covered by the period between 1811 and 1880, who was one of
the most faithful marine artists of the time, whose father was well
known as an engraver of Turner’s pictures, who himself was also at
one time largely engaged on similar work, has an illustration showing
a British frigate with both t’gallant and royal stuns’ls. It seems
unlikely that so accurate an artist as Cooke should make such a
mistake, although the weight of evidence is decidedly against him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account