Saint Vincent, with notes and publishers' pricesNapier, Francis John Hamilton Scott
History
Saint Vincent, with notes and publishers' prices
Napier, Francis John Hamilton Scott
Postage stamps -- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
watermark could therefore be distinguished.
Although all the stars in St. Vincent stamps are of the same size,
owing to the “bits” being hand-made they vary a little in shape, and we
have seen faulty ones having one or more rays with the points broken
or twisted out of their proper direction. Besides this there are two
rather distinct varieties in the shape of the star. These exist side by
side in the same sheet. In the star more usually found all the six rays
are of similar size; in the other variety the two opposite rays in the
vertical line are narrower at the base than the other four, so that they
are thinner throughout their length, and end in a more acute angle. This
last variety of star is in shape almost exactly like the larger stars
found in the paper used by the same firm for printing the stamps of South
Australia and certain other Colonies.
In the thicker varieties of paper it is sometimes very difficult to
see the watermark. This is especially the case when the specimens are
unused and have the gum intact. The change in the colour of the One
Penny from red to black marked that stamp at once, so that we find its
advent recorded in the _Stamp Collector’s Magazine_ of September 1871,
and in the _Philatelist_ and _Timbre-Poste_ of the following month,
the last-named periodical being the only one to mention the watermark
or perforation, which last was given as 14½. We learn from the list
of Messrs. Perkins, Bacon & Co. that the consignment was sent out on
March 28th, 1871, and consisted of 300 sheets (18,000 stamps) of One
Penny, black, and a like number of Six Pence, green; and, since the One
Penny was chronicled in September, we may assume that the issue took
place some time in June. There can be little doubt that the Six Pence
was issued with the One Penny, although it was unnoticed at the time
by philatelists, probably because the colour was unchanged, and the
watermark, owing to the thickness of the paper, not readily seen. It was
not until September, 1872, that it was chronicled by M. Moens in the
_Timbre-Poste_, which is the only record of it we can find in any of the
philatelic periodicals.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account