Saint Vincent, with notes and publishers' pricesNapier, Francis John Hamilton Scott
History
Saint Vincent, with notes and publishers' prices
Napier, Francis John Hamilton Scott
Postage stamps -- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
We now see how deep was the mystery enshrouding the Four Pence on star
paper of Issue 12, when the editor of the leading English philatelic
periodical had been ignorant of its existence up to this time, and even
then failed to perceive any difference, except in the perforation,
between it and the Four Pence of 1866.
The provisional Four Pence has always been a very rare stamp; and it is
probably much scarcer than it is generally credited to be, as it has been
a favourite with the forgers of all nations, who have in some instances
been able to produce articles that pass current as genuine even in
circles believing themselves to be well-informed. We refrain, for several
reasons, from giving the measurements of the surcharge. First, because,
owing to the “4d.” being generally deeply indented in the paper, it is
not at all easy to measure it with accuracy; and also because, as regards
dimensions, there is a very dangerous forgery frequently met with, which
is not to be detected by any amount of measurement, however carefully
done, and which can only be distinguished by careful comparison.
Particular attention must be paid to the shape of the different angles of
the figure “4,” and especially to the contour of the top of that figure,
and to the way in which the slanting stroke joins the horizontal and the
vertical ones. The forgery alluded to fails in these particulars, but
it is like the genuine in this—that it is heavily printed, although not
quite so deeply indented as the genuine is _sometimes_ found.
Our illustration, No. 15, represents a well-known forgery of British
manufacture, which has been kindly lent to us for the purpose by a
gentleman to whom it was presented by the artist himself as a specimen
of his skill. This is a much easier forgery to detect than the one we
have just been speaking about, as it is generally accompanied by a forged
postmark, and is altogether too smoothly printed. Its measurements are
also incorrect, the foot of the figure “4” being fully ½ mm. too long.
There are a good many specimens of this latter forgery in circulation.
Another point to which we direct attention is, that in the genuine stamps
the black bar across the sheet begins on the left exactly flush with
the left of the figure “4” of the left hand stamp of the row, and ends
exactly under the right edge of the tail of the letter “d” of the right
hand stamp. It follows from this, that when the surcharges have been
printed in register with the sheet, the three stamps of the left hand
vertical column and the corresponding three on the right have the words
of value only partly obliterated, the bar under the “4d.” only reaching
part of the way across the label containing the original value.
Issue 17.
_December 1881._
“One Penny” in black on 6d., bright yellow-green, of Issue 14.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account