Saint Vincent, with notes and publishers' prices — John Shaqi
Saint Vincent, with notes and publishers' pricesNapier, Francis John Hamilton Scott
History
Saint Vincent, with notes and publishers' prices
Napier, Francis John Hamilton Scott
Postage stamps -- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
For some reason Messrs. De La Rue & Co. do not appear to have made
much use of the comb-machine for the stamps of St. Vincent; it may be
because their machines were in constant requirement for British stamps.
The One Penny, and “2½ Pence” on 1d., rosy-lake, two of the first three
values printed by them, were perforated by this comb-machine; but with
the exception of one or two other stamps that we shall specify in our
notes to the various issues, the remainder, including all the stamps
now current in the Island, have been perforated by one or other of the
guillotine-machines.
We have not thought proper in our Reference List to make any distinction
between the two machines gauging 14, nor have we catalogued stamps
showing part of the words “Crown Agents” in the watermark, as we feel
that had we done so we should have been adding a fresh terror to stamp
collecting, already over-burdened by the weight of “varieties.”
The gum on all the stamps of Section II. is usually white, but sometimes
varies to a pale yellow.
The colours of the stamps are for the most part brighter than those used
by Messrs. Perkins, Bacon & Co., and the combination of the line-engraved
plates with the colours, paper, and perforations of Messrs. De La Rue
& Co. produce certainly some of the finest stamps that have ever been
printed.
Issue 19.
_January 1883._
1d., drab.
4d., bright blue.
These two stamps, the first to be printed for the Colony by Messrs. De
La Rue & Co., were chronicled in the _Philatelic Record_ of February,
1883, so we may safely put down the date of issue as January. The colours
of both values were unchanged, and, allowing for the difference of
appearance in Messrs. De La Rue & Co.’s stamps, caused by the whiteness
and surfacing of the paper, there is hardly any change to be noticed even
in their shades. The One Penny is perforated 14, the machine used having
been the “comb.” The Four Pence is also perforated 14, but not having
been able to examine a block, or even a pair of these stamps, we are
unable to say which of the two machines was used. In all probability it
was the guillotine-machine.
Issue 20.
_February 1883._
“2½ PENCE,” in black, on 1d., rosy-lake.
Although a surcharged, this is by no means a provisional stamp, since it
was made to obviate the necessity of making a plate for the new value
of Two Pence Halfpenny required for the Postal Union rate, and, with
a change of colour of the One Penny value on which the surcharge is
printed, it has remained current ever since its issue in February, 1883.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account