Salt and the salt industryCalvert, Albert Frederick
History
Salt and the salt industry
Calvert, Albert Frederick
Salt industry and trade; Salt industry and trade -- England -- Cheshire
It must be explained that the Marbury Pipe Line had been laid in 1882
by the Mersey Salt & Brine Company, who carried it, by agreement,
across lands belonging to private landowners and over a canal belonging
to the North Stafford Railway. The railway made a formal protest, but
an amicable settlement was ultimately reached by which the Mersey
Salt Company agreed to pay the North Stafford Company £5 a year and
to remove the pipe on receipt of a three months’ notice. The railway
company appear to have persisted with their opposition in order to
force an admission from the Mersey Company that they possessed no
permanent right to carry the pipe across their canal, but the concern
was of such trifling importance that it was practically ignored by the
people of the district, and for twenty years after the property of
the Mersey Salt Company and the Marbury Brine Pipe had been acquired
by the Salt Union, the question of the removal of brine from the
neighbourhood in which it was raised had found all classes of the
salt community united against such proposals. But with the completion
of the works at Weston Point, and the enlargement of the Marbury
Pipe and the installation of powerful engines, capable of driving
millions of gallons of brine from Marbury to be converted into salt
at the sea-board, a new menace was organized against which the Urban
Authorities and Local Councils made a long and spirited, if fruitless,
resistance.
In the autumn of 1910, the North Stafford Railway served the Salt Union
with a notice to remove their pipe line from the Trent and Mersey Canal
by the end of the following March, and the Salt Union proving obdurate,
the towns of Northwich, Winsford, and Middlewich promoted the Brine
Pumping (Cheshire) Bill, “to regulate the conveyance of brine pumped,
raised and gotten” in the county. The original draft, which proposed
to permit the removal of brine by pipe to a distance of three miles
within the county from the place at which it was raised, was amended
to permit manufacturers to carry brine by pipe from one set of works
to another in their own occupation, and they further attempted to meet
the alleged rights of the Salt Union by the insertion of a clause
allowing the Marbury Pipe to be used for the conveyance of brine to
the extent of 250 million gallons a year. But the Salt Union declined
all conciliatory overtures, and combated the Bill before the Select
Committee on the grounds that it was a proposal to alter the common
law of England and interfere with the sacred rights of property. The
injury that was sought to be done, not only to the Salt Union but to
the export trade of the country, was enlarged upon, and the Committee
may have been impressed by the assurance that the Union, so far from
intending to leave Winsford and Northwich, expected to do an even
greater trade in those districts in the future than had been done
there in the past. In the result, the Salt Union’s insistence upon the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account