Samuel Richardson's Introduction to PamelaRichardson, Samuel
General
Samuel Richardson's Introduction to Pamela
Richardson, Samuel
Richardson, Samuel, 1689-1761. Pamela
If she had _wanted_ those Improvements, which she found means to
acquire in her _Service_, it wou’d have been very unlikely, that she
shou’d have succeeded so well; and had destroy’d _one_ great _Use_
of the Story, to have allow’d such uncommon Felicity to the Effect
of mere _personal Beauty_.---And it had not been _judicious_ to have
represented her as educated in a superior Condition of Life with the
proper Accomplishments, before she became reduc’d by Misfortunes,
and so not a Servant, but rather an Orphan under hopeless
Distresses---because Opportunities which had made it no Wonder how
she came to be so winningly qualified, wou’d have lessen’d her Merit
in being so. And besides, where had then been the purpos’d
Excitement of Persons in PAMELA’s Condition of Life, by an Emulation
of her Sweetness, Humility, Modesty, Patience, and Industry, to
attain some faint Hope of arriving, in time, within View of _her_
Happiness?----And what a delightful Reformation shou’d we see, in
all Families, where the Vanity of their _Maids_ took no Turn toward
Ambition to _please_, but by such innocent Measures, as PAMELA’s!
As it is clear, then, the Author was under a Necessity to suppose
her a _Servant_, he is not to be accountable for mistaken
Impressions, which the Charms he has given her may happen to make,
on wrong Heads, or weak Hearts, tho’ in Favour of Maids the Reverse
of her Likeness.
What is it then (they may say) that the Lowness, and Distance of
_Pamela’s_ Condition from the Gentleman’s who married her, proposes
to teach the _Gay World_, and the _Fortunate_?---_It is this_---By
Comparison with that infinite Remoteness of her Condition from the
Reward which her Virtue procur’d her, one great _Proof_ is deriv’d,
(which is Part of the _Moral_ of PAMELA) that Advantages from
_Birth_, and Distinction of _Fortune_, have no Power at all, when
consider’d against those from _Behaviour_, and Temper of _Mind_:
because where the _Last_ are _not added_, all the _First_ will be
boasted in vain. Whereas she who possesses the Last finds _no Want_
of the First, in her Influence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account