Samuell Gorton: A Forgotten Founder of our Liberties; First Settler of Warwick, R. I. — John Shaqi
Samuell Gorton: A Forgotten Founder of our Liberties; First Settler of Warwick, R. I.Janes, Lewis G. (Lewis George)
History
Samuell Gorton: A Forgotten Founder of our Liberties; First Settler of Warwick, R. I.
Janes, Lewis G. (Lewis George)
Gorton, Samuel, 1592 or 1593-1677; Rhode Island -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; Warwick (R.I.)
This is substantially the conclusion of Judge Brayton. (Defence of
Samuel Gorton).
Footnote 67:
That Gorton believed in civil government also clearly appears in his
correspondence relating to the Quakers, where he expressly dissents
from their views about government.
Footnote 68:
_Vide_ Nowell, Rawson, Winthrop, Winslow, Morton, _et al._
Footnote 69:
“The Father was never knowne nor is he knowable but in Christ.”
(Commentary on the Lord’s Prayer).
Footnote 70:
The quotations, unless otherwise indicated, are from Gorton’s
unpublished Commentary on the Lord’s Prayer. (Commentary, p. 101).
Footnote 71:
“Though no church was formed in connection with his ministrations, he
exercised a powerful influence upon the religious views of the
Colony.” History of Warwick, p. 301. By Orris Payson Fuller, B. A.
Footnote 72:
He also differed with the Friends of his day in his views about
government.
Footnote 73:
This is strongly emphasized in his Commentary on the Lord’s Prayer.
Footnote 74:
Commentary Mss., p. 11. See, also, p. 14, _et seq._, as well as
“_Simplicities Defence_,” (R. I. Hist. Soc. Ed.) page 183.
Footnote 75:
Commentary Mss., page 57.
Footnote 76:
Dr. Fiske is in error in classing him as a follower of Anne
Hutchinson. His theology was original and peculiarly his own.
(Commentary Mss., p. 58).
Footnote 77:
Commentary Mss., p. 90.
Footnote 78:
It is hardly necessary to say that neither Gorton or Parker held this
doctrine in any materialistic sense. It was a lofty philosophical
conception that the entire creative energy was expressed in the divine
nature, to conceive which as purely masculine was inadequate,
anthropomorphic and irrational.
Footnote 79:
The first charge against Roger Williams, on which he was banished from
Massachusetts Bay, accused him of teaching “That wee have not our land
by Pattent from the King, but that the natives are the true owners of
it and that wee ought to repent of such receiving it by Pattent.”
Gorton agreed with Williams as to the necessity of purchase from the
Indians, but thought the charter also necessary.
Footnote 80:
John M. Mackie, in “_Sparks’s American Biography_.”
Samuel Eddy, Secretary of State of Rhode Island, _circum_ 1820, says
of Gorton: “From the first establishment of the government he was
almost constantly in office, and during a long life there is no
instance of record to my knowledge of any reproach or censure cast
upon him, no complaint of him, although history furnishes abundance of
evidence that there were no lack of enemies to his person, principles,
or property. This can hardly be said of any other settler of the
Colony of any standing.” Quoted in Judge Brayton’s “_Defence of Samuel
Gorton_.”
Footnote 81:
_Vide_ Winthrop’s Letters, the Portsmouth charges, etc.
Footnote 82:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account