After thirteen months’ absence Sarah at length returned to Europe.
The total receipts during her American tour were a million dollars,
of which her own share was £60,000. She landed in England on May 6th,
not, as might be supposed, to rest, but to start off again on another
tour, under the management of Mr. Mayer, through England, Scotland, and
Ireland. On August 10th she started for Cauterets, and begun to prepare
for her return to Paris. She re-opened with _La Tosca_ on November
24, 1887, and long and loud was the applause that greeted her. M.
Sarcey alone withheld unstinted praise, and took exception, not to the
artiste’s talents but to her use of them, and indulged in criticisms of
the play itself. M. Sardou responded in a letter addressed to a third
person, in which he took advantage of the opportunity to make a hit at
the critics of his work--
MONSIEUR,
You ask for my opinion on Sarah Bernhardt. It is simply that she is
an admirable artiste, and that, in _La Tosca_, she has far exceeded
anything that has been done in our generation by Georges, Dorval,
or Rachel. As for Sarcey, who knows nothing about painting, music,
architecture, or sculpture, and to whom Nature has harshly denied
all sense of the artistic, it is not surprising that he should be
not merely indifferent but even hostile to any attempt to reproduce
the past by means of scenery, costume, and the representation of
former customs. He showed this feature by his treatment of _La
Haine_, but it would be unjust to blame him for this defect in his
intellect. If he likes to play the part of the fox who lost his
tail, by all means let him do it.
Cordially yours,
V. SARDOU.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account