In designing the Telstar satellite, both its internal and external
temperatures had to be controlled. The electronics canister inside the
satellite operates best if it stays at approximately room temperature of
65 to 75°F. This much heat is supplied in the canister by dissipation of
electrical energy from the solar cells. The container is well insulated
to keep its temperature relatively stable, and it has shutters that open
automatically if it begins to get overheated (_see above_). The
operating characteristics of the solar cells on Telstar’s surface also
had to be considered; they work better at rather cool temperatures. So
we decided to keep the satellite’s skin at an average temperature of
about 0°F, although temperatures actually will range quite a bit above
and below the average as the satellite moves from sun to shadow.
Now, using this average temperature of 0°F (converted to 460°R) as _T_
in our formula, we can solve for α/ε. We find that this gives us a ratio
of approximately 0.7 for the satellite’s surface. However, this presents
a problem. Almost 40 per cent of Telstar’s surface is taken up by its
power plant of 3600 sapphire-covered solar cells. These cells,
unfortunately, have a relatively high α/ε ratio—their α is 0.8 and their
ε is 0.54, for an α/ε of 1.5. This means that the portion of the surface
not used by either solar cells or antenna openings must, in order to
give us an over-all average of about 0.7, have a very low α/ε ratio—less
than 0.3.
To get this sort of ratio, we had to select carefully the material for
the outer surface of the Telstar satellite. There were many kinds of
surfaces that might have been used; they could have been metal or
non-metal, rough or smooth, shiny or dull. And they could have been any
color from black to white. However, to get a 0.3 ratio we needed
something with a relatively high emissivity for the low-frequency
electromagnetic radiation that the satellite emits and a rather low
absorptivity for the high-frequency radiation coming from the sun. High
emissivity meant that we should use a nonmetal surface rather than
polished metal, since the emissivity of nonmetals is quite high at the
temperatures in which we were interested, while that of polished metals
is relatively low. And, to get low absorptivity, we decided that the
color of these surface areas should be very close to a pure white.
[Illustration: _Partially molten aluminum oxide particles being
sprayed onto aluminum outer surface panels._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account