*SATIRES AND PROFANITIES* _By_ *James Thomson* _With a Preface by G. W. Foote_ _London_ _1884_ CONTENTS PREFACE THE DEVIL IN THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND RELIGION IN THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS THE STORY OF A FAMOUS OLD JEWISH FIRM CHRISTMAS EVE IN THE UPPER CIRCLES HEINE ON AN ILLUSTRIOUS EXILE WITH SOMETHING ABOUT WHALES THE DAILY NEWS JESUS: AS GOD; AS A MAN THE ONE THING NEEDFUL THE SWINBURNE CONTROVERSY GREAT CHRIST IS DEAD RESURRECTION AND ASCENSION OF JESUS SOME MUSLIM LAWS AND BELIEFS THE CHRISTIAN WORLD AND THE SECULARIST THE ATHANASIAN CREED OUR OBSTRUCTIONS MR. KINGSLEY’S CONVERTITES THE PRIMATE ON THE CHURCH AND THE WORLD SPIRITISM IN THE POLICE COURT A COMMISSION OF INQUIRY ON ROYALTY Draft A BIBLE LESSON ON MONARCHY PRINCIPAL TULLOCH ON PERSONAL IMMORTALITY THE ESTABLISHED CHURCH PREFACE Believing as I do that James Thomson is, since Shelley, the most brilliant genius who has wielded a pen in the service of Freethought, I take a natural pride and pleasure in rescuing the following articles from burial in the great mausoleum of the periodical press. There will doubtless be a diversity of opinion as to their value. One critic, for instance, has called “The Story of a Famous Old Jewish Firm” a witless squib; but, on the other hand, the late Professor Clifford considered it a piece of exquisite mordant satire worthy of Swift. Such differences are inevitable from the very nature of the subject. Satire, more than any other form of composition, rouses antipathy where it does not command applause; and the greater the satire, the more intense are the feelings it excites. But which side, it may be inquired, is likely to be the best judge? Surely the friendly one. Sympathy is requisite to insight, as Carlyle says; while hostility blinds us to a thousand virtues and beauties. I am aware that many will take objection to the employment of satire at all, whether good or bad, on religious topics; but this seems to me preposterous, and I should readily answer it, if Thomson had not done so himself in the most vigorous and triumphant manner. Nearly all the pieces in this volume appeared originally in the National Reformer or the Secularist. I have attempted no arrangement of them, not even a chronological one; the compositor has shuffled them at his own sweet will. All I have done, besides collecting them and carefully reading the proofs, is to indicate in each case the year of first publication; and I think the reader will approve this plan as both modest and sensible.