Footnote 118:
Milchhöfer, _Die Anfänge der Kunst_, p. 16 _et seqq._; Petrie,
_Egyptian Decorative Art_, p. 29.; Much, _Die Kupferzeit_, p. 55;
Hall, _The Oldest Civilization of Greece_, p. 157; A. C. Haddon,
_Evolution in Art_, p. 141. Dr. Arthur Evans, on the contrary,
believes that the spiral was first used in stonework, and only at a
later date transferred to metal and other materials (_Journal of
Hellenic Studies_, Vol. XIII, p. 329).
Footnote 119:
Petrie, _Egyptian Decorative Art_, p. 22.
Footnote 120:
Among the jewellry discovered by M. de Morgan at Dahshûr (_temp._
Usertsen II) was an exquisite gold ring (certainly _not_ of Egyptian
manufacture), with two spirals worked on its bezel in gold wire-work.
(See De Morgan, _Dahchour_, I, p. 68, fig. 145.) In the Ashmolean
Museum is a black ware vase from Egypt of the style characteristic of
the late Twelfth Dynasty deposits, which has a punctuated returning
spiral ornament round the upper part of its body.
Footnote 121:
A. J. Evans, _Primitive Pictographs_, in _Journal of Hellenic
Studies_, Vol. XIV, p. 328. _Cf._ G. Coffey, _The Origins of
Prehistoric Ornament in Ireland_, in _Journal of the Royal Society of
Antiquaries of Ireland_, 1894, 1895; and A. C. Haddon, _Evolution in
Art_, p. 142. J. Romilly Allen, _Celtic Art in Pagan and Christian
Times_, pp. 51-54.
Footnote 122:
On this place-name, see p. 172, note 1.
Footnote 123:
An asterisk prefixed to these descriptions means an _ancient_
clay-impression or “sealing,” not an actual cylinder.
Footnote 124:
A cylinder-seal of “Amenemhat, beloved of Sebek, Lord of Anu,” is in
the H.-P. Collection (_Cat._ 3813).
Footnote 125:
Nub-hetep-tha-Khred was a daughter of Amenemhat III. (De Morgan,
_Dahchour_, I, p. 128.)
Footnote 126:
On this title, see Newberry, _El Bersheh_, I, p. 8, note 3.
Footnote 127:
_I.e._, the Judge or Chief Justice. See my _Life of Rekhmara_, p. 18.
Footnote 128:
The rings, scarabs, etc., figured from the tomb of Maket have been
drawn from Prof. Petrie’s _Illahun_, pl. XXVI.
Footnote 129:
This is probably the same place-name as the Kerŷ mentioned in the tomb
of Hûŷ at Thebes as the southern boundary of Kush (Ethiopia) at the
time of King Tût-ankh-amen (see Pl. II). It was almost certainly the
modern Gebel Barkal.
Footnote 130:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account