Scatalogic Rites of All Nations: A dissertation upon the employment of excrementitious remedial agents in religion, therapeutics, divination, witchcraft, love-philters, etc., in all parts of the globeBourke, John Gregory
Religion
Scatalogic Rites of All Nations: A dissertation upon the employment of excrementitious remedial agents in religion, therapeutics, divination, witchcraft, love-philters, etc., in all parts of the globe
Bourke, John Gregory
Scatology
Where urine is applied in bodily ablutions, the object sought is
undoubtedly the procuring of ammonia by oxidation, and in no case of that
kind is it sought to ascribe an association of religious ideas. But where
the ablutions are attended with ceremonial observances, are incorporated
in a ritual, or take place in chambers reserved for sacred purposes,
it is not unfair to suggest that everything made use of, including the
urine, has a sacred or a semi-sacred significance.
No difficulty is experienced in assigning to their proper categories the
urinal ablutions of the Eskimo of Greenland (Hans Egede Saabye, p. 256);
of the Alaskans (Sabytschew, in Phillips, vol. vi.); of the Indians of
the northwest coast of America (Whymper’s “Alaska,” London, 1868, p. 142;
H. H. Bancroft, “Nat. Races,” vol. i. p. 83); of the Indians of Cape
Flattery (Swan, in “Smithsonian Contrib.”); of the people of Iceland (see
below); of Siberia (see below); and of the savages of Lower California.
Pericuis of Lower California. “Mothers, to protect them against the
weather, cover the entire bodies of their children with a varnish of coal
and urine.”—(Bancroft, vol. i. p. 559.)
Clavigero not only tells all that Bancroft does, but he adds that the
women of California washed their own faces in urine.—(“Hist. de Baja
California,” Mexico, 1852, p. 28; see, also, Orozco y Berra and Baegert.)
“People of Iceland are reported to wash their faces and hands in
pisse.” (Hakluyt, “Voyages,” vol. i. p. 664.) This report was, however,
indignantly denied of all but the common people by Arugrianus Jonas, an
Icelandic writer.
The inhabitants of Ounalashka “wash themselves first with their own
urine, and afterwards with water.”—(“Russian Discoveries,” William Coxe,
London, 1803, quoting Solovoof’s “Voyage,” 1764, p. 226.)
In the same volume is to be found the statement that in Alaska and the
Fox Islands, the people “washed themselves, according to custom, first
with urine, and then with water.”—(p. 225, quoting “Voyage of Captain
Krenitzin,” 1768.)
When a child gets very dirty “with soot and grease,” a Vancouver squaw
uses “stale urine” to cleanse it. “This species of alkali as a substitute
for soap is the general accompaniment of the morning toilet of both
sexes, male and female. During winter they periodically scrub themselves
with sand and urine.”—(J. G. Swan, “Indians of Cape Flattery, Smithsonian
Contributions to Knowledge,” No. 220, p. 19.)
Among the Tchuktchees, urine “is a useful article in their household
economy, being preserved in a special vessel, and employed as a soap or
lye for cleansing bodies or clothing.”—(“In the Lena Delta,” Melville, p.
318.)
“But they also wash themselves, as well as their clothes, with it; and
even in the hot bath, of which men and women are alike fond, because
they love to perspire, it is with this fluid they sometimes make their
ablutions.”—(Lisiansky, “Voyage round the World,” London, 1811, p. 214.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account