Religious disputations -- Fiction; Short stories, Australian
"There is, O Priest, a higher truth and a higher seriousness," he said.
"In the epic of Gilgamesh is enshrined the religious consciousness of
Babylonia. It is sacred. It is not to be touched. It contains those
great truths which are not a peculiar feature of any one age, but are
true for all time. It was directly inspired by Bel, and shall we set our
pitiful human wisdom above the wisdom of the divine word?"
Bagoas once again wiped his mouth before he began to speak.
"I deny," he said, "that it has any truth as an historical document. It
is valuable, historically, as an instance of the narrow limits of human
knowledge in the age which produced it. That is all its value to the
historian. Its value to the theologian is different. He finds in it the
first concrete expression of man's relation to God, as he understands
it. The truth may be veiled in a mist of fable and metaphor, but he
feels it to be there. At the same time, he gives it an extended sense,
and interprets it in a larger spirit than that in which it was
originally interpreted. It means to us at once something more and
something less than it did to the ancient world; for religion is not a
definite revelation of an eternal truth, but the contemplation of the
unknown from the sum of man's experience. It is consequently susceptible
of infinite development and extension, it reacts to every new discovery
of science; and its chief glory is that it is part of man's daily life.
"We, the priests of Bel, recognise our sacred books as the
starting-point of a living, growing truth; in our hands is the duty of
interpreting it, and our interpretation is of the nature of a
commentary. We are continually rejecting some details as unsound, and
developing others to the utmost limits of their power; that is our value
and duty as an hierarchy: to criticise, to prune, to graft. And if we
consider the nature of the books, in which are enshrined those great
spiritual truths, we see how necessary this work of selection and
rejection is; for they do not form one inseparable, concrete whole, but
each has arisen under the impulse of different circumstances, each had
its own separate development and origin before it became joined on to
the main body.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account