Schenk's Theory: The Determination of SexSchenk, Samuel Leopold
Science
Schenk's Theory: The Determination of Sex
Schenk, Samuel Leopold
Sex determination, Genetic; Sex preselection
If an attempt be made (Richarz) to explain the different facts
observed, in accordance with the theory in question, no insuperable
contradictions will be met with. The general excess of male births,
their corresponding increase during the loss of many men in war (a loss
of distinctly stronger men), the high proportion of male births in the
case of mothers who produce their first-born at a comparatively late
age, the same high proportion where polygamy prevails, and, further,
the diminution of male births in the case of unmarried mothers, which
should not be overlooked,--all these phenomena are declared to be in
accord with Richarz’s views.
We will proceed here to give a brief sketch of Richarz’s opinion. Ribot
powerfully supports it in every particular from his own experience and
from historical data. The primary impulse upon which the whole process
of generation depends lies in the organs of the mother. Here lies also
the substratum in which is, as it were, the center of gravity of the
special generative process.
The function of the male sex is to evoke from the feminine substratum
an organism, or, more strictly speaking, to occasion a change in the
germ. If the mother’s generative capacity reaches the highest point the
result is a boy, who in external appearance resembles his mother.
If, however, it happens that the forces which act in the mother are
inferior to those of the father, the infant will be a female. She will
resemble her father, and will also inherit her father’s temperament.
Sex is not a transmissible attribute inherited directly from the
parents. Personal appearance and other characteristics will on the
whole correspond rather more with one of the parents than with the
other. Yet in every case the influence of the other parent will make
itself felt, and will in many respects exercise a modifying influence
over external appearance and other characteristics.
These views have been attacked by Roth, who declares himself against
Richarz’s hypotheses. His objections are contained in a work entitled
‘The Phenomena of Heredity’ (_Ueber die Thatsachen der Vererbung_). He
directly attacks the theory of cross-heredity of sex, and according to
his theory claims for each parent an equal share in the formation of
the future individual, at least in the earliest stages. Fecundation,
according to Roth, would at once be effective in determining the sex of
the future individual.
We shall have occasion hereafter to speak of the observations which
Mayerhofer has made upon the origin of sex. Here we shall mention only
a single fact. This is a result of his experiments with animals, and
seems to have a relation to the theory of cross-heredity of sex.
Ewes impregnated by a powerful ram bear more males than females, so
long as the ram is in possession of his full forces. After a time the
ram has to perform his functions repeatedly during a few days, as great
numbers of the ewes are rutting. The fatigued or exhausted ram then
begets only females.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account