Schenk's Theory: The Determination of SexSchenk, Samuel Leopold
Science
Schenk's Theory: The Determination of Sex
Schenk, Samuel Leopold
Sex determination, Genetic; Sex preselection
It seems that in cases where a result was obtained it could be more
easily explained by the principles which have been already described
under the theory of cross-heredity of sex. The assumption of a greater
or lesser degree of ripeness of the ovum which was to be developed was
a very questionable one.
The different processes with which we have become, in more recent
times, acquainted as symptoms of the ripening of the ovum, are not
here intended. Such symptoms can be observed both in the ova of
the invertebrata and in those of the vertebrata. These symptoms,
which are such as the attainment of the normal size of the ovum of
the species in question, the protrusion of the orientation points
(_Richtungskörperchen_), the steps towards the formation of a female
anterior nucleus (_Vorkern_), etc., do not here apply, for the
recognition of that higher degree of ripeness in the ovum which is
necessary at the time of fructification for the development of a male
individual.
All the above symptoms occur alike in the ova destined for the male and
for the female sex. That ripeness of the ovum upon which Thury’s theory
insists, lies in the nature of the ovum apart from any anatomical
signs. It is a condition of the ovum which we can only attempt to
explain by laying down the principle that an ovum which has been for a
longer time prepared in the female generative organs previously to its
fertilization, must be riper than another which has had less time for
this preliminary process.
* * * * *
We have mentioned above that on the occasion of Thury’s experiment,
the desired result was effected in twenty-nine cases. Pagenstecher,
Siebold, and Köll have dealt critically with Thury’s work. Coste was
not in a position to confirm these experiments, nor to verify them.
In order to test Thury’s results as applied to the human subject,
Schröder obtained the assistance of young women, who were in a position
to give him positive and accurate information respecting the time at
which they became pregnant. The women could name the day on which they
had had sexual intercourse, and knew the date of the last menses.
From careful calculation of the interval between these dates, it was
possible to ascertain approximately at what stage impregnation of the
ova took place, the degree of ripeness of the impregnated ova could
also be inferred from the space of time that had elapsed since the
last menstruation, and the sex of the fœtus was noted. Schröder found
that on an average of twenty-six cases in which boys were born, the
conception had taken place 10.08 days after menstruation; on an average
of twenty-nine cases in which girls were born, 9.76 days after. In
consequence, he was not able to confirm Thury’s theory in the case of
the human subject.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account