School educationMason, Charlotte M. (Charlotte Maria)
Philosophy
School education
Mason, Charlotte M. (Charlotte Maria)
Education -- Curricula; Education -- Philosophy
=Relations and Interests.=—I have throughout spoken of ‘_Relations_,’
and not of ‘_Interests_,’ because interests may be casual, unworthy,
and passing. Everyone, even the most ignorant, has interests of a sort;
while to make valid any one relation, implies that knowledge has begun
in, at any rate, that one direction. But the defect in our educational
thought is that we have ceased to realise that knowledge is vital; and,
as children and adults, we suffer from underfed minds. This intellectual
inanition is, no doubt, partly due to the fact that educational theorists
systematically depreciate knowledge. Such theorists are, I think,
inclined to attach more importance to the working of the intellectual
machinery than to the output of the product; that is, they feel it to be
more important that a child should _think_ than that he should _know_.
My contention is rather that he cannot _know_ without having _thought_;
and also that he cannot think without an abundant, varied, and regular
supply of the material of knowledge. We all know how the reading of a
passage may stimulate in us thought, inquiry, inference, and thus get
for us in the end some added knowledge. The depreciation of which I
speak is by no means of set purpose, nor is it even realised; but the
more education presents itself as a series of psychological problems, the
greater will be the tendency to doctor, modify, and practically eliminate
_knowledge_;—that knowledge, which is as the air, and the food, and
the exercise, the whole life of the mind of man. In giving ‘education’
without abundant knowledge, we are as persons who should aim at physical
development by giving the maximum of exercise with the minimum of food.
The getting of knowledge and the getting of delight in knowledge are the
ends of a child’s education; and well has said one of our prophets, “that
there should one man die ignorant who had capacity for knowledge, this I
call a tragedy.”
To sum up, I believe that our efforts at intellectual education commonly
fail from six causes:—
=Causes of Failure.=—(_a_) The oral lesson, which at its worst is very
poor twaddle, and at its best is far below the ordered treatment of
the same subject by an original mind in the right book. (The right
books exist, old and new, in countless numbers, but very great care
is necessary in the choice, as well as much experience of the rather
whimsical tastes and distastes of children.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account