School-life at Winchester College : $b or, the reminiscences of a Winchester junior under the old régime, 1835-40.Mansfield, Robert Blachford
History
School-life at Winchester College : $b or, the reminiscences of a Winchester junior under the old régime, 1835-40.
Mansfield, Robert Blachford
Students -- England -- Winchester; Winchester College -- History
I now come to the crying evil of the times I write of, and of which I
am happy to say I had but a slight experience, as during my time the
whole system was entirely changed. The evil that I speak of, is the way
in which the dinner was managed. All the other little discomforts that
I may have undergone as a Junior, seem luxurious pleasures when I think
of that infernal dinner hour. This meal took place at _six_ o’clock P.M.
in College, (in Commoners’ it was at _one_;) it was ample in quantity,
and excellent in quality. That of the Præfects was nicely served up in
joints, that of the Inferiors was divided into portions, (“Dispars;”)
there were, if I remember rightly, six of these to a shoulder, and eight
to a leg of mutton, the other joints being divided in like proportion.
All these “Dispars” had different names; the thick slice out of the
centre of the leg was called “a Middle Cut,” that out of the shoulder a
“Fleshy,” the ribs “Racks,” the loin “Long Dispars;” these were the best,
the more indifferent were the end of the shoulder, or “Cat’s head,” the
breast, or “Fat Flab,” &c., &c.
On Sundays we had beef, except for six weeks at Easter, when we had
veal. Potatoes were served up in pewter dishes, (“Gomers;”) they were
not very good hot, and the Candlekeeper generally took possession of
those served at his End, and had them kept till the next day for frying,
as above described. Each End and Præfect’s mess had their beer served
up in a large white jug, or “Bob.” The vessel used for the same purpose
in Commoners was called a “Joram.” There was nothing to complain of in
the dinner, though it would have been pleasanter if the meat had been
served in joints instead of lumps, and if we had had plates instead of
trenchers to eat it off; however, to the twenty Juniors at any rate, it
was of very slight importance whether the dinner was comfortably served
or not, as they seldom got any. The distribution was managed as follows:
one of the cooks, escorted by the Præfect of Tub, brought up an immense
tray, with a mountain of meat on it; this was taken first to the senior
Candlekeeper’s end, and then to the others in succession. But only those
boys who were at the End at the time it was brought were permitted to
take their dinners, except the Candlekeepers, who were allowed to have
theirs taken by proxy. As will be seen, it was simply impossible for the
Juniors to be up to time, the consequence of which was that more than
half the dinners were not taken; these were thrown into “Tub” at the end
of Hall, whence they were ultimately taken away by some poor women, and
I always understood, (though I am not certain that such was the case,)
that the “Præfect of Tub” got a certain sum for each “Dispar” not taken,
and so had a direct interest in managing that as many as possible should
go without their dinner. I will now explain the absence of the Juniors;
immediately the Præfects were seated, the whole Hall resounded with
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account