Schools of Gaul in the last century of the Western Empire : $b A study of pagan and Christian education in the last century of the Western empireHaarhoff, T. J. (Theodore Johannes)
History
Schools of Gaul in the last century of the Western Empire : $b A study of pagan and Christian education in the last century of the Western empire
Haarhoff, T. J. (Theodore Johannes)
Education, Ancient -- France; Gaul -- History -- 58 B.C.-511 A.D.
Valentinian I, ‘the frontier emperor’, restored the defences of the
West against the barbarians (367-8). Trouble was brewing among the
Persians,[848] says Ammianus, ‘but Valentinian, conceiving in his mind
great things and profitable’, fortified the whole of the Rhine from
Rhaetia to the sea, strengthened camps and forts, planted many towers in
suitable spots along the Gallic frontier, and sometimes even across the
river close to barbarian territory.[849] Zosimus remarks on his care for
the provinces and for the Celtic peoples.[850]
Even the usurper Constantine, ‘the vain deliverer of Gaul’, as Gibbon
calls him, in A.D. 407 ἐγκατέστησε ... καὶ τῷ Ῥήνῳ πᾶσαν ἀσφάλειαν, ἐκ
τῶν Ἰουλιανοῦ βασιλέως χρόνων ῥᾳθυμηθεῖσαν.[851]
One of the panegyrists[852] mentions ‘sapientia’ as a blessing of the
empire, ‘ipsa ... illa quae videtur rerum omnium domina esse’, and
this wisdom comes by experience of men and things, ‘perspectis hominum
moribus et exploratis rerum eventis’. By giving opportunities to the
Gauls for studying and mixing with different types from all parts of the
world, Roman rule contributed to the general culture of the country; and
the provincial orator is not guilty of his usual exaggeration when he
emphasizes the fact that in this way, too, the empire was a boon at this
time to the education of Gaul.
But against these real and undeniable advantages there may be set some
corresponding drawbacks. Elaborate centralization[853] may be good from
a purely military point of view, but it checks the progress of the human
spirit. The panegyrists show how excessive the expenditure of the central
court was, and how the interests of the empire were sacrificed to the
sovereign.[854] The accession of Julian was a boon, for ‘the provinces
were exhausted, partly by the plundering barbarians, partly by the greed,
destructive as it was disgraceful, of the provincial governors.’[855]
And of Julian the orator asks in a way which affirms the charge on the
part of his enemy Constantius: ‘Flagitiis administrantium non modo frena
laxaret, sed etiam stimulator accederet...?’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account