Schools of Gaul in the last century of the Western Empire : $b A study of pagan and Christian education in the last century of the Western empireHaarhoff, T. J. (Theodore Johannes)
History
Schools of Gaul in the last century of the Western Empire : $b A study of pagan and Christian education in the last century of the Western empire
Haarhoff, T. J. (Theodore Johannes)
Education, Ancient -- France; Gaul -- History -- 58 B.C.-511 A.D.
This over-centralization resulted in over-interference in education. ‘The
traditional liberty which had formed the foundation of Roman education
was seriously infringed by the appearance of imperial privileges....
All these benefactions were in reality an interference in the affairs
of education.... Thus from the second to the fourth centuries of our
era, the complete transformation of school organization was quietly
accomplished. It is the transition period between the ancient Roman
school and the formalism of the Middle Ages.’[856] This stiffening
of the imperial support into formalism and tyranny is seen in the
Theodosian Code. The personal liberty of the teacher becomes more and
more restricted. Theodosius and Valentinian decreed[857] in 425 that no
State teachers, on pain of being driven from the city with the stigma
of ‘infamia’, were to hold classes in public outside the prescribed
limits. Tutors in private families were permitted if they confined their
teaching to the inmates of the house. But all who taught in the emperor’s
Capitoline ‘auditorium’ were strictly forbidden to teach privately or
else they must lose all the privileges of their office.
It looks as if this prohibition of all public schools outside the
imperial academy was directed against the itinerant sophists. The law
was issued at Constantinople and it may have been a salutary measure in
some ways; but there is a suspicion that the emperor is rather abusing
his authority to favour his own particular college, and the principle of
vesting such unlimited powers over education in one man is a dangerous
one. The penalty imposed on those who disobey this injunction (_infamia_
and banishment) seems to be disproportionately severe. It smacks of that
rigidity which made the emperor forbid the masters of his academy (_intra
Capitolii auditorium_) to teach, even privately, elsewhere. And it is a
continuation of that coercive attitude on the part of the imperial patron
towards the schools, which we see increasing from the beginning of our
period when Julian enacted that every teacher must receive the imperial
approval before he was qualified to teach.[858] He was right in insisting
on efficiency, but his evident attempt to abolish private adventure
schools can hardly be justified.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account