Schools of Gaul in the last century of the Western Empire : $b A study of pagan and Christian education in the last century of the Western empireHaarhoff, T. J. (Theodore Johannes)
History
Schools of Gaul in the last century of the Western Empire : $b A study of pagan and Christian education in the last century of the Western empire
Haarhoff, T. J. (Theodore Johannes)
Education, Ancient -- France; Gaul -- History -- 58 B.C.-511 A.D.
A curious instance of the survival of rhetoric is seen in the invective
of Hilary of Poitiers against Constantius.[947] The author has worked up
a great deal of feeling, and, to give it the most effective utterance,
he lets it flow into the moulds prescribed by tradition. His divisions
correspond perfectly to those of the schools. He spares no form of
contumely, even at the expense of historical fact.[948] His railing
reminds us of Milton’s denunciation of Salmasius:[949] for as late as
the seventeenth century Latin retained its reputation as the language
of invective. In spite of his preliminary professions of sincerity:
‘cesset itaque maledictorum opinio et mendacii suspicio. Veritatis enim
ministros decet vera proferre’, we feel that in following the rules of
the game he has proved himself a good player, but not always ‘a servant
of truth’.[950]
Of a truer type was the rhetoric of Hilary of Arles. Honoratus is
enthusiastic about the copious eloquence of his oratory, the gems of
expression which he produced, the varied shades and shapes of his
descriptions.[951] There was plenty of rhetorical colour, but there was
also elasticity. ‘If the learned company was absent, he fed the hearts of
the untutored with simple food’; and it was the opinion of contemporary
critics, the savants of the day, that Hilary ‘had attained something that
was neither eloquence nor learning, something superhuman’.[952] Famous
for eloquence were also Salvian, the master of fiery denunciation, and
Lupus, ‘scholis adhibitus et rhetorum studiis imbutus’.[953] In the very
monasteries the artifices of the rhetor’s school lingered. Valerian,
Bishop of Cemelium (near Nice), gives many examples of this in his
Homilies. He frequently uses Parallelism and Repetition: ‘Disciplina
igitur magistra est religionis, magistra verae pietatis; quae nec ideo
increpat ut laedat, nec ideo castigat ut noceat’;[954] or Chiasmus and
Assonance: ‘Alter de subscriptione patris disputat: alter de fratris
persona desperat’;[955] ‘Vitare ista, dilectissimi, per singulos gradus
forte difficile est, et laboriosum multis simul hostibus per diversos
errores occurrere’; or Alliteration: ‘Ita _e_st _e_rgo, ut in te antiqui
iuris districtio nihil habeat potestatis, si ea quae legis _p_lenitudo
_p_ostulat, _o_bedienter _o_bserves’.[956] ‘Et _n_ullus _p_rofecto adhuc
_p_oenae finis _n_isi Christus _n_oster cruentis _l_egibus o_l_eum
_m_isericordiae _m_iscuisset.’[957] ‘Sic erit ut _h_omo de _h_umiliore
_l_oco ad ce_l_siora perveniat et remuneratus honore _c_ondigno,
_c_aelestis gratiam potestatis adquirat.’[958]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account