Schools of Gaul in the last century of the Western Empire : $b A study of pagan and Christian education in the last century of the Western empireHaarhoff, T. J. (Theodore Johannes)
History
Schools of Gaul in the last century of the Western Empire : $b A study of pagan and Christian education in the last century of the Western empire
Haarhoff, T. J. (Theodore Johannes)
Education, Ancient -- France; Gaul -- History -- 58 B.C.-511 A.D.
Thus the wiser among the Christians opposed the policy of exclusiveness.
They foresaw that though bigoted zeal and a natural antipathy might keep
out pagan letters for a time, in the end they could not do so; and they
realized that it was one of the functions of the Church to hand down what
was good in the old culture. So the two Apollinarii (fourth century),
Christian teachers of Laodicea, turned the Old Testament into heroic
verse and the New Testament into Platonic dialogues;[1002] Juvencus put
the gospels into metre, and Nonnus wrote out St. John in hexameters. In
order to appeal to the intellectual classes the Christian writers were
bound to follow the pagan models, and so a virtue was made of necessity:
for amid the distraction of the failing Empire it was the Church alone
that could have saved the form and content of the ancient culture by
providing scribes for the one and thinkers for the other. It would have
been interesting to have Paulinus of Nola’s Panegyric on Theodosius.
‘Quid interfuerit tum inter Christianum oratorem, et oratorem, in
scriptis saltem, paganum’ (says Monnard[1003]) ‘diiudicare liceret,
nisi temporis invidia Panegyrico Theodosii, quem Paulinus scripserat,
quemque cum Ausonii Panegyrico conferre potuissemus nos privavisset.’ We
should also have been able to see how far he followed the pagan model,
especially in view of his extreme statements to Ausonius[1004] on the
subject of pagan literature. Probably he was just as rhetorical as Hilary
in his Demosthenic denunciation of Constantine. This supposition is
confirmed by the words of Jerome, who is enthusiastic in his praise of
the speech. ‘If the author’, he says, ‘surpasses others in the beginning
of his oration, towards the end he excels himself. His style is brilliant
with Ciceronian purity, yet copious in thought.’[1005] There was a
certain amount of hypocrisy in the railing of the Christian writers
against the pagan authors.
In spite of her criticism and antipathy, therefore, the Church listened
to her leaders in their wiser moods and saved pagan culture. She set
her monks to copy the ancient authors.[1006] Augustine ‘brought Plato
into the (Christian) schools under his bishop’s robe’, and even Jerome
expounded lyric and comic poets to the children at Bethlehem.[1007]
Vergil, in particular, was admitted on account of the prophecy supposed
to be contained in the fourth _Eclogue_. Roman law, of which Bossuet said
that good sense, the master of human life, reigned throughout it, was
regarded by the Church as a reflection of divine justice, and studied
more particularly on account of its supposed similarity to the law of
Moses.[1008] Through the Church it passed to the barbarians, and so
became a heritage of the civilized world.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account