Schools of Hellas: An Essay on the Practice and Theory of Ancient Greek Education from 600 to 300 B. C.Freeman, Kenneth J. (Kenneth John)
History
Schools of Hellas: An Essay on the Practice and Theory of Ancient Greek Education from 600 to 300 B. C.
Freeman, Kenneth J. (Kenneth John)
Education, Greek
There are several interesting accounts of these Sophists in extant
literature, but the writers are always prejudiced opponents.
In the _Clouds_ of Aristophanes, the Sophists and their pupils are
represented as living in an underground Thinking-Shop. They are pale
and squalid, engaged in all sorts of researches. Natural history is
represented by the important question, “How many times the length of
its own foot does a flea jump?” a problem which is solved by actual
experiment. Later in the play they inquire why the sea does not
overflow, since the rivers are always running into it. Scientific
instead of mythological explanations of thunder and lightning are
given. There is religious criticism too, such as Xenophanes had
uttered long before: “If Zeus imprisoned his own father, why has he
not been punished?” There is astronomy, “the paths and orbit of the
sun,” and a hanging basket is introduced as an observatory. Geometry
and compasses are mentioned. The visitor is shown a map of the world,
containing Euboia, Lakedaimon, and Attica on a large enough scale, it
would seem, to mark the deme Kikunna; perhaps, as Strepsiades expects
to find dikastai on it at Athens, it had pictures of elephants and
monsters in unknown districts. The students are interested in metres
and rhythms. The poet laughs at grammar, forming “cockess” as the
logical feminine of cock, and making the chief Sophist object to
feminine nouns with masculine terminations. It is suggested that the
pupils at the Thinking-Shop are dirty, half-starved vegetarians, too
economical to go to the hair-cutter or the baths, abstaining from wine
and the gymnasia. But the main point attacked by Aristophanes is the
teaching of Argument. The whole object of learning under the Sophists
is, according to him, to be able to cajole the dikastai and so win
impunity to cheat, and to have an argument to justify anything. The
successful scholars beat their fathers and mothers, giving logical
reasons for their behaviour; they refuse to go to school, and are too
clever to believe or accept anything. But their intellectual
exhilaration is spasmodic; they have been taught, if they reach a
difficult problem, to jump on to something else.
A vivid sketch of Sophist-life is given in Plato’s _Protagoras_. Young
Hippokrates, on returning to Athens in the evening after pursuing a
runaway slave to the frontier, hears that Protagoras the great Sophist
has arrived in the city. Only the lateness of the hour deters him from
rushing off to find Sokrates, who will give him an introduction to the
teacher. Next morning he comes round to Sokrates’ house long before it
is light, bangs and shouts at the door in his excitement, and
announces that he is ready to spend all the money which he and all his
friends possess, in fees.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account