Schools of Hellas: An Essay on the Practice and Theory of Ancient Greek Education from 600 to 300 B. C.Freeman, Kenneth J. (Kenneth John)
History
Schools of Hellas: An Essay on the Practice and Theory of Ancient Greek Education from 600 to 300 B. C.
Freeman, Kenneth J. (Kenneth John)
Education, Greek
This reveals the method of teaching. The teacher, as here and in
Isokrates’ case, recites a speech of his own, explaining how it was
done and asking for criticism from the pupils. Then the pupil would
learn it by heart and declaim it in some solitary place. On other
occasions, as Sokrates does here, the master would take the speech of
some rival professor and criticise it severely, composing a better
speech himself. The _Bousiris_ and _Helen_ of Isokrates show this
method. Or else the pupil replied to the teacher, or the teacher wrote
two speeches on opposite sides of the question. The extant work of
Antiphon and the lost work of Gorgias[564] are of this type.
Most of the Attic orators seem to have taken pupils. Isaios taught
Demosthenes. Demosthenes in his turn seems to have had great
popularity as a teacher. He “promises to teach young men the art of
speaking”;[565] “he filled Aristarchos with empty hopes of becoming
the prince of orators all in a moment”;[566] “he invited some of his
pupils to come and listen to the speech _On the False Embassy_,
promising to show them how to cheat and mislead the audience”;[567]
“later on he will brag before his boys of his tricks.” These passages
give an interesting picture of Demosthenes and his pupils, as seen
through his opponent’s green spectacles.
* * * * *
In opposition to the schools of Rhetoric stood the schools of
Philosophy, leading their pupils towards the life of retirement and
contemplation and away from the strenuous life of political and social
activity.[568] We have seen that there were many professors of
Philosophy at Athens in Isokrates’ time, charging fees of three or
four mnai for their course. But only one of them is known to
posterity, and he gave lessons gratis. Otherwise, Plato must be taken
as a member of a class, albeit the most brilliant member. The teaching
of Plato centred, as is well known, round the Akademeia. Plato
possessed a house and garden, which he bequeathed to his school,
between that gymnasium and Kolonos. When he and his pupils wished to
be private they could withdraw into his gardens; otherwise they
frequented the Akademeia, from which their school took its name. It
was not every one who could obtain admission to the school, for, as
Plato taught gratuitously, he could pick and choose his pupils. He
expected would-be students to be well grounded in Geometry: there must
have been some sort of entrance-examination. His successor,
Xenokrates, finding that an applicant was ignorant of Music, Geometry,
and Astronomy, told him to go away: “for you give philosophy no chance
of getting a grip upon you.”[569] The inner circle of the school had
their meals in common: the banquets were extremely plain. Timotheos,
the Athenian general, who was accustomed to rich living, after having
been a guest at one of these meals, remarked, on meeting Plato next
day, “Your suppers are more pleasant on the following day than they
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account