Schools of Hellas: An Essay on the Practice and Theory of Ancient Greek Education from 600 to 300 B. C.Freeman, Kenneth J. (Kenneth John)
History
Schools of Hellas: An Essay on the Practice and Theory of Ancient Greek Education from 600 to 300 B. C.
Freeman, Kenneth J. (Kenneth John)
Education, Greek
From Plutarch’s mention of stealing from the _men’s_ dining-clubs it
may safely be inferred that boys of this age dined apart. Whether it
was always in the Eiren’s house cannot be ascertained. After the age
of sixteen they must have come into the men’s syssitia; for Xenophon
implies that the visitor to Sparta could see lads of that age at
dinner and ask them questions: and a visitor would certainly not have
dined in a dining-room meant only for boys. Whether the election of
members took place at that age, or whether they still went to their
fathers’ clubs, is unknown.
The education was almost entirely physical. Plutarch, it is true, says
that they learnt “letters, because they were useful.”[24] This may
have been a later introduction, or perhaps the amount learnt was so
little as to justify Isokrates in saying that the Spartans “do not
even learn their letters, which are the means to a knowledge of the
past, as well as of contemporary events”;[25] he also thought it
highly improbable that even “the most intelligent of them would hear
of his speeches, unless they found some one to read them aloud.”[26]
They had, indeed, little reason to learn to read. Their written laws
were very few, and these they learnt by heart, set to a tune. They had
nothing to do with commerce or even with accounts; very few of them
knew how to count.[27] Hippias, the Sophist, found that all they cared
to listen to, were “genealogies of men and heroes, foundations of
cities, and archæology generally.” Probably, like the Dorian
philosopher Pythagoras, and like Plato, the admirer of all things
Dorian, they held that memory was all-important, and that the use of
writing weakened it.[28] Besides the State-laws set to music there
were songs which praised dead heroes and derided cowards: the diction
was plain and simple, the subjects grave and moral; many of them were
war-marches; all were incentive to pluck and energy.
Rhetoric was, of course, utterly forbidden: a young man who learnt it
abroad and brought it home was punished by the Ephors.[28] Spartans
learned to be silent as a rule; when they spoke, their remarks were
short and much to the point, for they thought it wrong to waste a
word.[29] This was definitely taught to the boys, as has been shown
above. “If you converse with quite an ordinary Laconian,” says
Plato,[30] “at first he seems a mere fool; then suddenly, at the
critical point, he flings forth a pithy saying, and his companions
seem no better than children compared with him.” This epigrammatic
wisdom Plato ironically ascribes to the fact that Laconians really
attend Sophists on the sly, and are greater philosophers than any one
knows. Many echoes of their terse and grim humour have come down to
modern times: such as Leonidas’ remark to his troops at Thermopylae,
“Breakfast here: supper in Hades”; and the Spartan’s description of
Athens, “All things noble there,” by which he meant that nothing,
however base, was counted ignoble.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account