Schools of Hellas: An Essay on the Practice and Theory of Ancient Greek Education from 600 to 300 B. C.Freeman, Kenneth J. (Kenneth John)
History
Schools of Hellas: An Essay on the Practice and Theory of Ancient Greek Education from 600 to 300 B. C.
Freeman, Kenneth J. (Kenneth John)
Education, Greek
The poet Aristophanes is the first to raise his voice against the
change. A few months before the utter ruin of Athens, he produces the
_Frogs_, which really repeats the attack of the _Clouds_, with
Euripides instead of Sokrates for the defendant. The poet is attacked
as at once the prophet of the new culture of the Sophists and of the
new artistic standards. The following are some of the chief faults
which Aristophanes finds with the new school represented by
Euripides:[702] (1) an undignified style of music, worthy only of the
bones as an accompaniment; (2) its habit of mixing all sorts of
incongruous musical rubbish together, “lewd love-songs, drinking
catches of Meletos, Karian flute-music, dirges, and dances”; (3) its
trills or shakes, as in εἰειειειειλίσσετε [eieieieieilissete]; (4) its
mixture of incongruous pictures, “dolphins, spiders, halcyons,
prophet-chambers, and race-courses,” pathos and bathos, commonplace
and solemnity; (5) bad metre, licenses of every sort, and frequent
“resolved” feet. As a parody of its habitual incongruity Aristophanes
gives:
“O God of the sea, that’s what it is. O ye neighbours,
behold yon monstrous deed: Gluke’s gone off with my cock.
Nymphs, ye daughters of the hills! Mary Ann, lend a hand.”
Aristophanes’ voice comes with a certain pathos, for the play is the
last utterance of Periclean Athens, just at the point of falling and
trying to find a scapegoat on whom to lay the responsibility of its
ruin: and the scapegoat chosen is the new artistic and musical
standard. The Ionic temperament had, in fact, broken away from all
restraint. The Doric canons of order, symmetry, regularity, and
solidity were thrown aside. Everything antique was treated with
disdain; all authority was rejected with scorn. No standards, ethical
or artistic, were tolerated. Perpetual change, daily novelty, became
the one desire of Athens. The foundations of belief, the bases of the
moral code, were broken down. The whole world seemed to be crumbling
away, and nothing was arising to take its place. Spectators became
dizzy with the eternal fluctuations. What wonder if they turned
longing eyes towards the one centre of gravity in Hellas, towards the
one place where politics, art, and ethics retained their old
stability, towards Sparta? So Sparta becomes the philosopher’s ideal,
and it is the Spartan canon that Plato tries to reimpose on Ionicism
running riot.[703] The fault which he finds with contemporary art and
music is that they simply try to please and amuse the audience, not to
educate and improve it.[704] They are like parents who try to soothe a
fractious child with sweetmeats when his health requires castor oil.
But the poets and artists are the slaves of the mob which pays them.
They must be freed from this control, and made the servants of the
government. Strict canons must be drawn up, which they must follow on
pain of being expelled from the State. The canons must be drawn up by
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account