Schools of Hellas: An Essay on the Practice and Theory of Ancient Greek Education from 600 to 300 B. C.Freeman, Kenneth J. (Kenneth John)
History
Schools of Hellas: An Essay on the Practice and Theory of Ancient Greek Education from 600 to 300 B. C.
Freeman, Kenneth J. (Kenneth John)
Education, Greek
The ordinary State, according to Xenophon, leaves its citizens to form
their own characters; but the Persian system definitely aims at
producing virtue. In every Persian city there is what is called the
“Free Agora.”[717] This is an open square, like the ordinary
market-place, but unlike it in being without shops or booths, for the
vulgar bustle and clamour of buying and selling is forbidden here, as
likely to disturb the peace and calm of the educated. Round it lie the
royal palace and the State buildings, so that it would be a place of
some architectural pretensions and not unlike the quadrangle of a
College at an English University. The square is divided into four
parts――one for the children, one for the epheboi, one for full-grown
men, and one for the old; for men of all ages have their place in this
College. Any Persian is at liberty to send his son to school here, but
only the rich can afford to support their sons while they attend the
classes: the poor man’s children, in Utopian Persia as in modern
England, must needs work for their living at an early age. The schools
are apparently only for boys: Xenophon has nothing to say here about
feminine education, although he approves of the Spartan system.
All boys under sixteen are ranged together in twelve companies,
according to the number of Persian tribes; of arrangement in classes
by age or intelligence nothing is said. They have to be in their
quarter of the Free Agora at daybreak. Their education is under the
control of twelve masters chosen from the elder men. What they learn
in school is _Justice_, as boys elsewhere learn letters. The system is
as curious as the subject. A sort of miniature law-court is
constituted, where the masters act as judges and the boys accuse one
another before them. The accusations must not be concocted for the
occasion, for any one found guilty of bringing a false charge against
a schoolfellow is severely punished. Smith Major has stolen Brown’s
bow and arrows, or Jones has called Robinson various opprobrious
names; the offenders are hauled up before the tribunal, duly tried,
and, if convicted, flogged.[718] Ingratitude is regarded as a
particularly heinous crime. It appears that promising pupils were
allowed to act as judges sometimes. The boy Kuros tells his mother how
he received this honour and once gave a wrong verdict, to his own
discomfiture. “The case was like this, mother,” he is made to say. “A
big boy wearing a small coat met a small boy wearing a big coat, and
compelled him to exchange. I was told to decide the case, and said
that it was best that each should have the coat which fitted him. Then
the master flogged me. For the point was, To whom did the big coat
belong? not, Whom did it fit best? It belonged to the boy who bought
or made it, not to the boy who took it by force, breaking the law.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account