Schools, School-Books and Schoolmasters: A Contribution to the History of Educational Development in Great BritainHazlitt, William Carew
History
Schools, School-Books and Schoolmasters: A Contribution to the History of Educational Development in Great Britain
Hazlitt, William Carew
Education -- Great Britain; Textbooks
III. The remaining contribution of Stanbridge to this class of literature
is his _Vulgaria_, which I take to be the least known. Dibdin describes it
somewhat at large, and it may be worth while to transfer a specimen
hither:--
"_Sinciput, et vertex, caput, occiput, et coma, crinis._
=hoc sinciput, is=, the fore parte of the heed
=hic vertex, cis=, for the crowne of the heed
=hoc caput, is=, for a heed
=hoc occiput, is=, the hynder parte of the heed
=hec coma, e=, for a brisshe
=hic crinis, nis=, for a heer
* * * * *
A garment a clothe idem apparayle
=Hic indumentum= =vestis= =vestitus= =amictus=
idem idem idem
=Ornatus= =simul apparatus= =amiculus idem=
a cappe agat: e idem
=Ista caput gestat apex= =caliptra= =galerus=
a cappe idem an hood idem
=Biretum= =pilius= =cuculus= =capitiumq=;
* * * * *
_Vulgaria quedā cū suis vernaculis compilata iuxta
consuetudinem ludi litterarij diui Pauli._
Good morowe. =Bonū tibi huius diei sit primordiū.=
Good nyght. =Bona nox, tranquilla nox, optata requies, &c.=
Scolers must lyue hardly at Oxford,
=Scolasticos Oxonii parce viuere oportet.=
My fader hath had a greate losse on the see.
=Pater meus magnā p naufragiū iacturā habuit.=
Wysshers and wolders be small housholders.
=Affectatibus diuitias modicā hospitalitatē obseruant.="
The abridgments of Stanbridge's _Accidence_ led, I presume, to the
distinction of the original text as the _Long Accidence_, although I have
not personally met with more than a single edition of the work under such
a title. Dibdin, however, has a story that John Bagford had heard of one
printed at Tavistock, for which the said John "would have stuck at no
price."
The chief of these adaptations of the _Accidence_ is the _Parvulorum
Institutio_, which I have described as probably emanating, in the first
place, from the earliest press for the use of the earliest known school at
Oxford. But it was reprinted with alterations by Stanbridge, and perhaps
by John Holt. In Dibdin's account of one of these recensions he
observes:--
"The work begins immediately on sign. A ij:-'What is to be done whan an
englysshe is gyuen to be made in latyn? Fyrst the verbe must be loked out,
and yf there be moo verbes than one in a reason, I must loke out the
pryncypall verbe and aske this questyon who or what, and that word that
answereth to the questyon shall be the nomynatyve case to the verbe.
Except it be a verbe Impersonell the whiche wyll haue no nomynative case.'
"On the last leaf but one we have as follows:--
=Indignus dignus obscenus fedus Cice. qq hecauditu
acerbus.= acerba sunt.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account