India -- Description and travel; Missionaries -- India -- Biography; Missions -- India; Swartz, Christian Frederick, 1726-1798
Meanwhile the anarchy and misery which increased in the unhappy kingdom
of Tanjore through the incapacity and profligacy of Ameer Sing and
his satellites made the position intolerable, and at last, after some
delay, the Court of Directors passed a minute under the presidency of
Lord Teignmouth, the new Governor-General, which practically settled
the title of Serfogee as the future and only ruler of the place. The
president therein expressed his entire disbelief in the pretensions of
the reigning Rajah and then proceeded to give his judgment upon the
important and reliable interposition of Schwartz upon this delicate
and complicated question. This eulogium of a venerable missionary in
a purely official document deserves preservation; certainly in modern
times such a testimony is rarely if ever adduced. These are the words
of Lord Teignmouth:
“With regard to Mr. Schwartz, whose name the president has never
heard mentioned without respect, and who is as distinguished for the
sanctity of his manners as for his ardent zeal in the promulgation of
his religion; whose years, without impairing his understanding, have
added weight to his character, and whose situation has enabled him to
be the protector of the oppressed and the comforter of the afflicted,
who, as a preacher of the Christian faith and a man without influence
except from character, was held in such estimation by the late Rajah,
a Hindu prince approaching to his dissolution, that he thought him
the fittest person he could consult concerning the management of his
country, during the minority of his adopted son, Serfogee; and who,
displaying more integrity than foresight, in the advice he gave, did
certainly not prove the enemy of Ameer Sing, since at his suggestion
he was named Regent--to the solemn assurance of such a man, the
president is compelled to declare his unqualified assent, and upon his
information he can easily reconcile the difference between the personal
declarations and the letters of the Rajah.”
In the end the Directors reversed the action of Sir Archibald Campbell
which, however, they declared, “was formed from the best and most
upright intentions,” and Lord Hobart expressed at the Madras Council
his entire concurrence in favour of Serfogee, and in due course he was
elevated to his rightful position, although not in full possession of
his rights until his aged friend and faithful protector had passed
away.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account