Science and poetryRichards, I. A. (Ivor Armstrong)
History
Science and poetry
Richards, I. A. (Ivor Armstrong)
English poetry -- 20th century -- History and criticism; Poetry
Poetry, in other words, cannot be imitated; it cannot be faked so
as to baffle the only test that ought ever to be applied. It is
unfortunately true that this test is often very difficult to apply.
And it is sometimes hard to know whether the test has or has not been
applied. For the test is this--that only genuine poetry will give to
the reader who approaches it in the proper manner a response which is
as passionate, noble and serene as the experience of the poet, the
master of speech, because he is the master of experience itself. But
it is easy to read carelessly and shallowly, and easy to mistake for
the response something which does not properly belong to it at all. By
careless reading we miss what is in the poem. And in some states of
mind, for example, when intoxicated, the silliest doggerel may seem
sublime. What happened was not due to the doggerel but to the drink.
With these general considerations in mind we may turn now from the
question--What can the dawning science of psychology tell us about
poetry?--to the allied questions--How is science in general, and the
new outlook upon the world which it induces, already affecting poetry,
and to what extent may science make obsolete the poetry of the past? To
answer these questions we need to sketch some of the changes which have
recently come about in our world-picture, and to consider anew what it
is that we demand from poetry.
V. The Neutralization of Nature
The poets are failing us, or we them, if after reading them we do not
find ourselves changed; not with a temporary change, such as luncheon
or slumber will produce, from which we inevitably work back to the
_status quo ante_, but with a permanent alteration of our possibilities
as responsive individuals in good or bad adjustment to an all but
overwhelming concourse of stimulations. How many living poets have the
power to make such deep changes? Let us set aside youthful enthusiasms;
there is a time in most lives when, rightly enough, Mr. Masefield, Mr.
Kipling, Mr. Drinkwater, or even Mr. Noyes or Mr. Studdert Kennedy may
profoundly affect the awakening mind; it is being introduced to poetry.
Later on, looking back, we can see that any one of a hundred other
poets would have served as well or better. Let us consider only the
experienced, the fairly hardened reader, who is familiar with a great
deal of the poetry of the past.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account