Science and the modern worldWhitehead, Alfred North
Religion
Science and the modern world
Whitehead, Alfred North
Science
rule is childishly simple: Each smallest coin of energy has a value in
strict proportion to the frequency belonging to that mode. By this rule,
and comparing farthings with cents, the frequency of an American would
be about twice that of an Englishman. In other words, the American would
do about twice as many things in a second as an Englishman. I must leave
you to judge whether this corresponds to the reputed characters of the
two nations. Also I suggest that there are merits attaching to both ends
of the solar spectrum. Sometimes you want red light and sometimes violet
light.
There has been, I hope, no great difficulty in comprehending what the
quantum theory asserts about molecules. The perplexity arises from the
effort to fit the theory into the current scientific picture of what is
going on in the molecule or atom.
It has been the basis of the materialistic theory, that the happenings
of nature are to be explained in terms of the locomotion of material. In
accordance with this principle, the waves of light were explained in
terms of the locomotion of a material ether, and the internal happenings
of a molecule are now explained in terms of the locomotion of separate
material parts. In respect to waves of light, the material ether has
retreated to an indeterminate position in the background, and is rarely
talked about. But the principle is unquestioned as regards its
application to the atom. For example a neutral hydrogen atom is assumed
to consist of at least two lumps of material; one lump is the nucleus
consisting of a material called positive electricity, and the other is a
single electron which is negative electricity. The nucleus shows signs
of being complex, and of being subdivisible into smaller lumps, some of
positive electricity and others electronic. The assumption is, that
whatever vibration takes place in the atom is to be attributed to the
vibratory locomotion of some bit of material, detachable from the
remainder. The difficulty with the quantum theory is that, on this
hypothesis, we have to picture the atom as providing a limited number of
definite grooves, which are the sole tracks along which vibration can
take place, whereas the classical scientific picture provides none of
these grooves. The quantum theory wants trolley-cars with a limited
number of routes, and the scientific picture provides horses galloping
over prairies. The result is that the physical doctrine of the atom has
got into a state which is strongly suggestive of the epicycles of
astronomy before Copernicus.
On the organic theory of nature there are two sorts of vibrations which
radically differ from each other. There is vibratory locomotion, and
there is vibratory organic deformation; and the conditions for the two
types of change are of a different character. In other words, there is
vibratory locomotion of a given pattern as one whole, and there is
vibratory change of pattern.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account