By adding heat the repulsive force is increased, until the molecules are
about twelve times as far apart as they were in each direction; while
the attractive force is overcome, and the molecules fly off in all
directions as soon as they are unconfined. On the other hand, by taking
heat away, the repulsive force is diminished, until the molecules become
inseparable and the water assumes the solid form.
It is probable that the expansion of fluid water, at a temperature below
39°, depends upon the molecules taking up a peculiar arrangement as they
approach one another. If sixteen men are formed into a column, four
deep, and each man a foot from the other, the same men may stand closer
together and yet form a hollow square, which occupies a larger space.
That the molecules of water do take up a particular order in assuming
the solid condition, is shown by the crystalline form of ice. Each
crystal of hoar-frost owes its shape to the arrangement of its
molecules, according to a definite geometrical pattern.
Thus the hypothesis that water is composed of separate molecules, is
useful, for it helps us to some extent to explain the properties of
water. And, when you study physics and learn the laws of motion, you
will find that there is no end to the number of the truths established
by observation and experiment, which can be explained by this
hypothesis. Hence it may fairly be adopted and employed as a means of
picturing to ourselves the order of nature, so long as no facts are
discovered which are inconsistent with it.
49. =All Matter is probably made up either of Molecules or of Atoms.=
The same reasons which lead to the adoption of the hypothesis that water
is composed of separate particles justify its extension to all forms of
matter whatever.
The metal =mercury= or =quicksilver=, for instance, may be supposed to
be made up of distinct particles of mercury of extreme minuteness, and
according to the temperature, these associate themselves in the solid
(frozen mercury), liquid (ordinary quicksilver), or gaseous form (vapour
of mercury). To whatever treatment pure mercury may be subjected, we
cannot get anything but mercury out of it. The particles of mercury have
never been broken up. Hence they are generally termed =atoms=, or
particles that cannot be divided; and mercury is said to be an
=element=, or a substance which is not compounded of any other
substances.
Here is a case in which it is very useful to distinguish between fact
and hypothesis. The matter of fact is that, up to the present time, no
one has been able to get out of pure mercury anything but pure mercury.
The statement that mercury is a simple substance, and therefore never
can be broken up into any other substances, is a hypothesis which future
observation and experiment may or may not confirm.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account