Scientific American, September 29, 1883 Supplement. No. 404Various
Science
Scientific American, September 29, 1883 Supplement. No. 404
Various
Science -- Periodicals
The Greeks appear at first as pupils and imitators of the
Phoenicians, but they soon surpassed their teachers in forms as well
as skill. They knew how to make their moulds so perfect, and were able
to place their cores so near the mantles, that the castings were as
thin as cardboard. The master founders of to-day have not reached that
perfection.
HARD BRONZES OF THE ANCIENTS.
We have already seen that only very pure bronze is suitable for weapons
and tools. It must be well "cooked," and all sulphur, lead, and tin
must be completely removed by oxidation. The best results are obtained
with from 8 to 12 per cent. of tin. A bronze having this composition is
tenacious and has a hardness of at least 4.
But the ancients were able to make much harder wrought bronzes, as
proved by our collections of weapons and tools.
Unfortunately we have no record of the devices employed; but as we
are able to make just such products and with simple means, we may
assume that the ancients employed essentially the same methods. In our
experience the following conditions are essential for the manufacture
of hard bronze:
1. A particular treatment.
2. A small amount of phosphorus.
It is well known that normal weapon bronze, unlike iron, is softened
by rapid cooling, but is hardened by hammering and rendered more
compact.[22]
By repeating this process, the bronze gains in hardness and strength,
and sheet bronze becomes lamellar by hammering or rolling, and hence
acquires a certain elasticity.[23] Besides, a slight admixture of iron
or nickel seems advantageous, but a slight amount of _phosphorus_ is of
the highest importance. The latter point may be somewhat enlarged on.
Ordinary bronze always contains _oxides_ of copper and tin, the
quantity increasing with the number of times it is recast. This oxide
makes it pasty, so that the different constituents do not separate, and
the casting is homogeneous.[24] This admixture of oxide does no harm
for castings in which strength is not demanded; but is of importance
for weapon bronze; the strength of which is considerably diminished by
the presence of the oxide.
In this respect a slight amount of phosphorus is an advantage by
preventing the formation of oxides, and consequently the mixture
remains a thin fluid until it begins to solidify. On the other hand
the metals are liable to separate. This evil can be avoided if the
alloy is allowed to cool nearly to solidification _before casting_,
and then cooled rapidly. Under these circumstances a homogeneous alloy
is obtained that is nearly fifty per cent. stronger and about 200 per
cent. more tenacious than bronze that contains oxides. The hardness and
strength can be still further increased by chilling and hammering.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account