Scientific American, September 29, 1883 Supplement. No. 404Various
Science
Scientific American, September 29, 1883 Supplement. No. 404
Various
Science -- Periodicals
Besides the indirect influence of phosphorus, it also has the _direct_
effect of hardening the bronze, because the compounds of phosphorus
with copper and tin have a very considerable hardness. These facts,
as well as the circumstance that we possess antique bronzes of
extraordinary hardness, induced me, with the consent of Baron Sacken,
to test the hardness of the bronze weapons in the Vienna Cabinet of
Antiquities. Some hard pieces,[25] were sent to Prof. Ludwig, who
followed the question with interest and agreed on the method of making
the analyses. The results were satisfactory. The bronzes contained
traces and up to one-fourth per cent. of phosphorus. Its presence had
prevented the formation of oxides in these bronzes, and consequently
the weapons were of extraordinary hardness. It now remains to ascertain
how the ancients made these phosphorus-bronzes. It is evident that the
phosphorus was not put directly into the metal, as is generally done at
present. There is another method so simple that we can assume that the
ancients employed it unintentionally. I refer to smelting the copper
or bronze with charcoal and any salt of phosphorus. In this case the
carbon would liberate phosphorus from the phosphoric acid, and it would
be taken up by the melted metal.
The ancient metallurgists may have made use of the eruptive rocks that
contain apatite, and with which copper ores are so often associated,
for slag or flux, or the phosphates that occur in the gangue may have
been smelted along with the ores; in both cases some phosphorus would
get into the metal. Finally it is not impossible that the ancients did
not put in phosphorus salts in some form. First of all I would mention
certain vegetable and animal substances that are rich in phosphorus,
especially _blood_,[26] which was a favorite with the old metallurgists
and alchemists as having a powerful enchantment. In each of the cases
referred to some phosphorus got into the metal, which thus acquired a
considerable hardness that could be increased in the well known manner
by chilling and hammering. Under certain circumstances weapons and
tools were made almost as hard as steel.
We can easily comprehend how bronze with these excellent qualities
could compete with steel at a time when rich ores were still abundant,
and thus it checked and restrained the development of the iron industry.
SUMMARY OF ALLOYS USED BY THE ANCIENTS.
_Egypt_.--The wrought metal of the Egyptians is a pure bronze with 6 to
14 per cent. of tin; 22 per cent. is an exceptional case; 1 per cent.
of iron is not rare.
The Egyptian cast metal is a plumbiferous bronze, with 4 to 11 per
cent. tin, and 7 to 12 of lead; in one case 16 per cent. tin; rarely 2
or 3 per cent. of zinc.
_Assyria_.--The Assyrian bronze is very pure. It consists of copper, 10
to 14 per cent. of tin, and traces of iron and nickel; in one case 18
per cent. of tin.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account