Scientific American Supplement, No. 312, December 24, 1881 — John Shaqi
Scientific American Supplement, No. 312, December 24, 1881Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 312, December 24, 1881
Various
Science -- Periodicals
In 1831, Neilson's hot blast specification had been published for two
and a half years only. The Butterly Company had tried the hot blast
for the first time in the November preceding the meeting of the
British Association. The heating of the blast was coming very slowly
into use, and the temperature attained when it was employed was only
some 600 degrees. The ordinary blast furnace of those days was 35 to
40 feet high, and about 12 feet diameter at the boshes, and turned out
about 60 tons a week. It used about 21/2 tons of coal per ton of iron,
and no attempt was made to utilize the waste gases, whether escaping
in the form of gas or in the form of flame, the country being
illuminated for miles around at night by these fires. The furnaces
were also open at the hearth, and continuous fire poured out along
with the slag.
In 1881, blast furnaces are from 90 ft. to 100 ft. high, and 25 ft. in
diameter at the boshes; they turn out from 500 to 800 tons a week. The
tops and also the hearths are closed, and the blast--thanks to the use
of Mr. E.A. Cowper's stoves--is at 1,200 degrees. The manufacture of
iron has also now enlisted in its service the chemist as well as the
engineer, and among those who have done much for the improvement of
the blast furnaces, to no one is greater praise due than to Mr. Isaac
Lowthian Bell, who has brought the manufacture of iron to the position
of a highly scientific operation. In the production of wrought iron by
the puddling process, and in the subsequent mill operations, there is
no very considerable change, except in the magnitude of the machines
employed, and, in the greater rapidity with which they now run. In
saying this, I am not forgetting the various "mechanical puddlers"
which have been put to work, nor the attempts that have been made by
the use of some of them to make wrought iron direct from the ore; but
neither the "mechanical puddler" nor the "direct process" has yet come
into general use; and I desire to be taken as speaking of that which
is the ordinary process pursued at the present in puddled iron
manufactures. In 1831, a few hundredweights was the limit of weight of
a plate, while in 1881, there may readily be obtained, for
boiler-making purposes, plates of at least four times the weight of
those that were made in 1831. I may, perhaps, be allowed to say that
there is an extremely interesting blue-book of the year 1818,
containing the report of a parliamentary committee which sat on boiler
explosions, and I recommend any mechanical engineer who is interested
in the history of the subject to read that book; he will find it there
stated that in the North of England there was a species of engines
called locomotives, the boilers of which were made of wrought iron,
beaten, not rolled, because the rolled plate was not considered fit;
it was added that if made of beaten iron the boiler would last at
least a year.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account