Scientific American Supplement, No. 484, April 11, 1885Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 484, April 11, 1885
Various
Science -- Periodicals
Now if we push the eyepiece toward the mirror the same distance on the
opposite side of the true focal plane, precisely the same appearance will
be noted in the expanded star disk. If we now place our plane surface any
where in the path of the rays from the great mirror, we should have
identically the same phenomena repeated. Of course it is presumed, and is
necessary, that the plane mirror shall be much less in area than the
spherical mirror, else the beam of light from the artificial star will be
shut off, yet I may here say that any one part of a truly spherical mirror
will act just as well as the whole surface, there being of course a loss
of light according to the area of the mirror shut off.
This principle is illustrated in Fig. 3, where _a_ is the spherical
mirror, _b_ the source of light, _c_ the eyepiece as used when the plane
is not interposed, _d_ the plane introduced into the path at an angle of
45° to the central beam, and _e_ the position of eyepiece when used the
with the plane. When the plane is not in the way, the converging beam goes
back to the eyepiece, _c_. When the plane, _d_, is introduced, the beam is
turned at a right angle, and if it is a perfect surface, not only does the
focal plane remain exactly of the same length, but the expanded star
disks, are similar on either side of the focal plane.
[Illustration: FIG. 9.]
I might go on to elaborate this method, to show how it may be made still
more exact, but as it will come under the discussion of spherical
surfaces, I will leave it for the present. Unfortunately for this process,
it demands a large truly spherical surface, which is just as difficult of
attainment as any form of regular surface. We come now to an instrument
that does not depend upon optical means for detecting errors of surface,
namely, the spherometer, which as the name would indicate means sphere
measure, but it is about as well adapted for plane as it is for spherical
work, and Prof. Harkness has been, using one for some time past in
determining the errors of the plane mirrors used in the transit of Venus
photographic instruments. At the meeting of the American Association of
Science in Philadelphia, there was quite a discussion as to the relative
merits of the spherometer test and another form which I shall
presently mention, Prof. Harkness claiming that he could, by the
use of the spherometer, detect errors bordering closely on one
five-hundred-thousandth of an inch. Some physicists express doubt on this,
but Prof. Harkness has no doubt worked with very sensitive instruments,
and over very small areas at one time.
I have not had occasion to use this instrument in my own work, as a more
simple, delicate, and efficient method was at my command, but for one
measurement of convex surfaces I know of nothing that can take its place.
I will briefly describe the method of using it.
[Illustration: FIG. 10.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account