Scientific American Supplement, No. 514, November 7, 1885Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 514, November 7, 1885
Various
Science -- Periodicals
to compute the theoretical heating powers of these fuels. In the case of
methane, CH_{4}, the formula is not true, but the error is not great
enough to seriously affect the result. This gives for the combustion of
one pound of:
Anthracite 14,500 Br. Heat Units.
Bituminous 14,200 " " "
Petroleum 20,300 " " "
Coal gas 20,200 " " "
Generator gas 3,100 " " "
Water gas 8,500 " " "
Reducing the above to terms of pounds of water evaporated from 212° F.,
we have:
POUNDS OF WATER EVAPORATED FROM 212° F.
Anthracite 15.023
Bituminous 14.69
Petroleum 21.00
Coal gas 20.87
Generator gas 3.21
Water gas 8.7
The results of experiments show the efficiency of fluid-burning furnaces
to be about ninety per cent., while with coal sixty per cent. may be
taken as a good figure. The great difference in the efficiencies is due
to the fact that fluid fuels require for combustion very little air
above the theoretical quantity, while with the solid fuels fully twice
the theoretical quantity must be admitted to dilute the products of
combustion.
Correcting our previous results for these efficiencies, we have:
POUNDS OF WATER ACTUALLY EVAPORATED FROM 212° F., PER POUND OF FUEL.
Anthracite 9.0
Bituminous 8.8
Petroleum 18.9
Coal gas 18.8
Generator gas 2.9
Water gas 7.8
These figures agree closely with the results of experiments.
We will now consider the subject of cost.
The following cities have been selected, as manufacturing centers,
termini of railroads, or fueling ports for steamers.
In the case of petroleum, as it is rarely shipped in the crude state, an
approximation is made by adding to the cost at the nearest shipping port
the freight charged on refined petroleum, and ten per cent. to cover
duties and other charges.
Owing to the difficulty of obtaining prices, in some of the cities,
there may be some errors.
COSTS. MARCH, 1884.
Anthracite Bituminous Coal gas
per ton of per ton of per 1,000
2,240 lb. 2,240 lb. cubic feet.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account