Scientific American Supplement, No. 561, October 2, 1886 — John Shaqi
Scientific American Supplement, No. 561, October 2, 1886Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 561, October 2, 1886
Various
Science -- Periodicals
Thin fires accomplish this. As already stated, a given amount of coal
generates a given amount of gas, and this gas requires a given amount
of air or oxygen. This air must be supplied through the grate bars and
then pass through the interstices of the mass of heated coal. It
requires about 10 cubic feet of air to consume one cubic foot of gas.
In stationary boilers we find that if we use "pea" and "dust" coal, an
extremely thin layer must be used, or the 10 feet of air per foot of
gas cannot pass through it; if "chestnut" coal be used, the thickness
may be increased somewhat; "stove size" allows a thickness of six
inches, and "lump" much thicker, if any wise man could be found who
would use that coarse, uneconomical size. Of course, I am speaking of
anthracite coal. Opinions differ about "soft coal," but the same
general principle applies as regards an unobstructed passage of air
through the hot bed of coal.
Now, it will be agreed that the locomotive of the future must be
improved to keep up with the times. Fierce competition requires
increased efficiency and reduced expenses. I am told by you railroad
gentlemen that the freight business of the country doubles every ten
years. Trains follow close upon each other. What are you going to do?
Are you to double, treble, or quadruple your tracks?
It seems to me much remains yet to be done with the locomotive. We
must burn a great deal less coal for the steam we make, and after we
have made steam we must use that steam up more thoroughly. In the
short cylinder required by locomotive service, the steam, entering at
the initial pressure pushes the piston to the opposite end, and it
then rushes out of the exhaust strong enough to drive another piston.
Of every four dollars' worth of coal consumed, at least two dollars
worth is absolutely thrown away. Or, of every ten thousand dollars
spent for fuel, five thousand dollars are absolutely wasted. How can
we save this? It would seem obvious that if steam rushes from the
exhaust of an engine strong enough to drive another engine, the common
sense of the thing would be to put another engine alongside and let
the steam drive it, and we should get just so much more out of our
four dollars' worth of coal. It seems evident that we must follow the
lead of the steamship men, and compound the locomotive engine, as
they have done with the marine engine.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account