Scientific American Supplement, No. 561, October 2, 1886Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 561, October 2, 1886
Various
Science -- Periodicals
The author next considered the strains to which a ship is exposed, and
stated that he had before him the calculations for three of the
largest vessels, two of them of iron and the other of steel; and he
found, in the case of the iron, the maximum tension on the gunwale
during the greatest hogging strains likely to be endured at sea would
not exceed about six tons per square inch, while in the case of the
steel ship it is only about 61/2 tons. These strains are well within the
limits of safety, and a comparison of the scantlings of these with the
others justifies the assertion as to their general safety from a
structural point of view. The sections of these three ships are shown
in Figs. 1, 2, and 3, with their principal scantlings. It will be seen
from these sections that the three ships differ materially in their
mode of construction. In the case of Fig. 1, which represents the City
of Rome, the largest of the three, it will be seen that the main
framing of the vessel is entirely transverse, with very heavy keelsons
in the bottom, and large partial bulkheads or web frames, and the
outside plating arranged on what is termed the edge to edge principle,
with a great portion of it double. In the next section, Fig. 2, the
Servia, which is built of steel, on the other hand, the bottom is
built on the longitudinal cellular system, the first application, he
believed, of this system to an Atlantic liner. The plating of the
Servia is of the usual alternate outer and inner strake system, partly
double; while the third section, the Oregon, approaches more nearly to
the ordinary system of framing and plating usually adopted, but it
will be seen that she was well tied in the bottom by very heavy
intercostal and plate keelsons, as well as in the top by heavy
stringers and sheer strakes, with much of her plating doubled, and
heavy web frames inside. The author next considered the question of
stability, and went on to deal with the subject of twin screws, and
stated that the Barrow Shipbuilding Company has done more in the way
of planning and designing for the adoption of twin screws lately than
for any other mode of propulsion, and this chiefly for passenger
steamers. He did not attach much importance to the particular form of
the blade either in single or twin screws, as he believed so long as
the disk area, the surface, and pitch were properly adjusted to the
speed of the vessel, and to enable the engines to use, at the maximum
speed, just the full quantity of steam that the boilers can make, we
have got pretty nearly as far as we can get. To fix these dimensions
of the propeller accurately at the present time, and without further
knowledge of the action of the screw on the water, was, he thought,
impossible. All the rules and formulae are empirical. The best one he
knew is given in Table IV., due to Mr. Thom, the head of the Barrow
Company's engineering drawing office, and at present acting manager,
who has used it for some years in practice.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account