Scientific American Supplement, No. 561, October 2, 1886Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 561, October 2, 1886
Various
Science -- Periodicals
Although this peculiar disharmony in the dispersive powers of the two
glasses, crown and flint, was discovered almost immediately after
achromatism was invented, it was only recently that the first
successful attempts were made to produce different glasses, which,
possessing the other requirements for achromatic objectives, would
produce coincident spectra, or nearer so than the ordinary crown and
flint glass do. It was about twelve years ago, if my memory serves me,
when I learned that a well-known English firm, engaged in the
manufacture of optical glass, had brought out some new glass possessed
of the desired qualities, and a little later I received a circular
describing the glass. But at the same time I learned that the new
glass was very soft and difficult to polish, and also that it had to
be protected from the atmosphere, and further, that an English
optician had failed to construct an improved telescope objective from
it. I had ordered some samples of the glass, but never received any.
A few months ago, news from Europe reached this country that another
and seemingly more successful attempt had been made to produce glass
that would leave no secondary spectrum, and that Dr. Zeiss, the famous
Jena optician, had constructed some new improved objectives from it.
But the somewhat meager description of these objectives, as given by
an English microscopist, did not seem fit to excite much enthusiasm
here as to their superiority over what had already been done in this
country. Besides this, the report said that the new objectives were
five system, and also that extra eye-pieces had to be used with them.
I confess I am much inclined to attribute the optical improvement,
which, according to Dr. Abbe's own remark, is very little, more to the
fact that the objectives are five system than to the new glass used in
their construction.
After a close study of a descriptive list of the new glass, received a
week or two ago from the manufacturers, I find, to my great regret,
that this new glass seems to suffer from a similar weakness to that
made by the English firm twelve years ago; as all the numbers of the
list pointed out by the makers as having a greatly reduced secondary
spectrum are accompanied with the special remark "to be protected."
Furthermore, from a comparison of the dispersive and refractive powers
of these glasses, as given in the list, I find that objectives
constructed from them will leave so great aberrations of higher order,
both spherical and chromatic, that the gain by the reduction of the
secondary spectrum would be greatly overbalanced.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account