Scientific American Supplement, No. 561, October 2, 1886 — John Shaqi
Scientific American Supplement, No. 561, October 2, 1886Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 561, October 2, 1886
Various
Science -- Periodicals
It may be urged, and with propriety, that the results obtained in
practice with the jet propeller are more favorable than our reasoning
would indicate as possible; but it will be seen that we have taken no
notice of conditions which seriously affect the performance of a
screw. There is no doubt that it puts water in motion not astern. It
twists it up in a rope, so to speak. Its skin frictional resistance is
very great. In a word, in comparing the hydraulic system with the
normal system, we are comparing two very imperfect things together;
but the fact remains, and applies up to a certain point, that the
hydraulic propeller must be very inefficient, because it, of all
propellers, drives the smallest quantity of water astern at the
highest velocity.
There is, moreover, another and a very serious defect in the hydraulic
propeller as usually made, which is that every ton of water passed
through it has the velocity of the ship herself suddenly imparted to
it. That is to say, the ship has to drag water with her. To illustrate
our meaning, let us suppose that a canal boat passes below a stage or
platform a mile long, on which are arranged a series of sacks of corn.
Let it further be supposed that as the canal boat passes along the
platform, at a speed of say five miles an hour, one sack shall be
dropped into the boat and another dropped overboard continuously. It
is evident that each sack, while it remains in the boat, will have a
speed the same as that of the boat, though it had none before. Work
consequently is done on each sack, in overcoming its inertia by
imparting a velocity of five miles an hour to it, and all this work
must be done by the horse towing on the bank. In like manner the
hydraulic propeller boat is continually taking in tons of water,
imparting her own velocity to them, and then throwing them overboard.
The loss of efficiency from this source may become enormous. So great,
indeed, is the resistance due to this cause that it precludes the
notion of anything like high speeds being attained. We do not mean to
assert that a moderate degree of efficiency may not be got from
hydraulic propulsion, but it can only be had by making the quantity of
water sent astern as great as possible and its velocity as small as
possible. That is to say, very large nozzles must be employed. Again,
provision will have to be made for sending the water through the
propeller in such a way that it shall have as little as possible of
the motion of the ship imparted to it. But as soon as we begin to
reduce these principles to practice, it will be seen that we get
something very like a paddle wheel hung in the middle of the boat and
working through an aperture in her hull, or else a screw propeller put
into a tube traversing her from stem to stern.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account