Scientific American Supplement, No. 620, November 19,1887 — John Shaqi
Scientific American Supplement, No. 620, November 19,1887Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 620, November 19,1887
Various
Science -- Periodicals
In all six shots were fired, five of which were for the purpose of
winning coal, while the sixth was expressly arranged as a "blowout
shot." The roburite--which resembles nothing so much as a common
yellow sugar--is packed in cartridges of about 41/2 in. in length and 11/2
in. in diameter, each containing about 65 grammes (one-seventh of a
pound) inclosed in a waterproof envelope. By dividing a cartridge, any
desired strength of charge can be obtained. The first shot had a
charge of 90 grammes (one-fifth of a pound) placed in a hole drilled
to a depth of about 4 ft. 6 in., and 13/4 in. in diameter. All the
safety lamps were carefully covered, so that complete darkness was
produced, but there was no visible sign of an explosion in the shape
of flame--not even a spark--only the dull, heavy report and the noise
made by the displaced coal. A large quantity of coal was brought
down, but it was considered by most of the practical men present to be
rather too much broken. The second shot was fired with a single
cartridge of 65 grammes, and this gave the same remarkable results as
regards absence of flame, and, in each case, there were no noxious
fumes perceivable, even the moment after the shot was fired. This
reduced charge gave excellent results as regards coal winning, and one
of the subsequent shots, with the same weight of roburite, produced
from 10 to 11 tons of coal in almost a solid mass.
It has been found that a fertile cause of accidents in coal mines is
insufficient tamping, or "stemming," as it is called in Yorkshire.
Therefore a hole was bored into a strong wall of coal, and a charge of
45 grammes inserted, and very slightly tamped, with the view of
producing a flame if such were possible. This "blowout" shot is so
termed from the fact of its being easier for the explosion to blow out
the tamping, like the shot from a gun, than to split or displace the
coal. The result was most successful, as there was no flash to relieve
the utter darkness.
The second set of experiments took place on October 24 last, in the
Monk Bretton colliery, near Barnsley, of which Mr. W. Pepper, of
Leeds, is owner. This gentleman determined to give the new explosive a
fair and exhaustive trial, and the following programme was carried out
in the presence of a very large gathering of gentlemen interested in
coal mining. The chief inspector of mines for Yorkshire and
Lincolnshire, Mr. F.N. Wardell, was also present, and the Roburite
Explosives Company was represented by Lieut.-General Sir John Stokes,
K.C.B., R.E., chairman, and several of the directors.
1. _Surface Experiments._--A shot fired on the ground, exposed. This
gave no perceptible flame (70 grammes of roburite was the charge in
these experiments).
2. A shot fired on the ground, bedded in fine coal dust. No flame nor
ignition of the coal dust was perceptible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account