Scientific American Supplement, No. 647, May 26, 1888Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 647, May 26, 1888
Various
Science -- Periodicals
maximum density of water is more desirable than that at the melting
point of ice. The fact, also, that the specific heats at constant
pressure and at constant volume are the same at the point of maximum
density, as shown by theory, is an additional argument in favor of
selecting this point for the standard. It thus appears that the
solution of this problem, which appears simple and very definite by
Mr. Hanssen's method, becomes intricate and, to a limited degree,
indeterminate when subjected to the refinements of direct experiment.
If the constants used by Hanssen are absolutely correct, then his
result must be unquestioned; but since physical constants are subject
to certain residual errors, one would as soon think of finding the
specific heat of air at constant volume, by using the value of the
mechanical equivalent as one of the elements, and trusting the result,
as he would to trust to the computed value of the mechanical
equivalent without subjecting it to the test of a direct experiment.
We will, therefore, examine the constants used to see if they are the
exact values of the quantities they represent.
He says they are universally accepted as correct; and this may be
true, when used for general purposes, and yet not be scientifically
exact. He uses 0.2377 as the specific heat of air. This is the value,
to four decimals, found by Regnault. Thus, Regnault gives for the mean
value of the specific heat of air
Between -30 deg. C and + 10 deg. C. 0.23771
" 0 deg. C " 100 deg. C. 0.23741
" 0 deg. C " 200 deg. C. 0.23751
And we know of no reason why one of these values should be used rather
than another, except that the mean of a large range of temperatures
may be more nearly correct than that of any other; and if this reason
determines our choice, the number 0.2375 would be used instead of
0.2377. Although this difference is small, yet the former value would
have reduced his result about 0.7 of a foot pound.
Again, he uses 0.1686 for the specific heat of air at constant volume.
The value of this constant has never been found to any degree of
accuracy by direct experiment, and we are still dependent upon the
method established by La Place and Poisson, according to which the
constant ratio of the specific heat of a gas at constant pressure to
that at constant volume is found by means of the velocity of sound in
the gas. The value of the ratio for air, as found in the days of La
Place, was 1.41, and we have 0.2377 / 1.41 = 0.1686, the value used by
Clausius, Hanssen, and many others. But this ratio is not definitely
known. Rankine in his later writings used 1.408, and Tait in a recent
work gives 1.404, while some experiments give less than 1.4, and
others more than 1.41.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account