Scientific American Supplement, No. 647, May 26, 1888Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 647, May 26, 1888
Various
Science -- Periodicals
The Romans, in their arched constructions, habitually strengthened the
point against which the vault thrust by adding columnar features to
the walls, as shown in Fig. 108; thus again making a false use of the
column in a way in which it was never contemplated by those who
originally developed its form. In Romanesque architecture the column
was no longer used for this purpose; its place was taken by a flat
pilaster-like projection of the wall (plan and section, Fig. 109),
which gave sufficient strength for the not very ambitious vaulted
roofs of this period, where often in fact only the aisles were
vaulted, and the center compartment covered with a wooden roof. At
first this pilaster-like form bore a reminiscence of a classic capital
as its termination; a moulded capping under the eaves of the building.
Next this capping was almost insensibly dropped, and the buttress
became a mere flat strip of wall. As the vaulting became bolder and
more ambitious, the buttress had to be made more massive and of
greater projection, to afford sufficient abutment to the vault, more
especially toward the lower part, where the thrust of the roof is
carried to the ground. Hence arose the tendency to increase the
projection of the buttress gradually downward, and this was done by
successive slopes or "set-offs," as they are termed, which assisted
(whether intentionally or not in the first instance) in further aiding
the correct architectural expression of the buttress. Then the
vaulting of the center aisle was carried so high and treated in so
bold a manner, with a progressive diminution of the wall piers (as the
taste for large traceried windows developed more and more), that a
flying buttress (see section, Fig. 110) was necessary to take the
thrust across to the exterior buttresses, and these again, under this
additional stress, were further increased in projection, and were at
the same time made narrower (to allow for all the window space that
was wanted between them), until the result was that the masses of
wall, which in the Romanesque building were placed longitudinally and
parallel to the axis of the building, have all turned about (Fig. 110,
plan) and placed themselves with their edges to the building to resist
the thrust of the roofing. The same amount of wall is there as in the
Romanesque building, but it is arranged in quite a new manner, in
order to meet the new constructive conditions of the complete Gothic
building.
[Illustration: Figs. 108-114.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account