Scientific American Supplement, No. 648, June 2, 1888.Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 648, June 2, 1888.
Various
Science -- Periodicals
On the evening of November 24, 1876, the late Dr. Schmidt, of Athens,
discovered a new star of the third magnitude, near Rho Cygni, in a spot
where he was certain that no bright star was visible four nights
previously. When first seen, it was somewhat brighter than Eta Pegasi. It
did not, however, remain long at this degree of brightness, but rapidly
decreased, and on November 30 had faded to fifth magnitude. It afterward
diminished very regularly, and in September, 1885, was estimated only
fifteenth magnitude with the 15½ inch refractor of Mr. Wigglesworth's
observatory. The star was examined with the spectroscope a few days after
its discovery, and showed bright lines similar to the "Blaze Star" in the
Northern Crown. One of these bright lines was believed to be identical
with Kirchhoff's No. 1474, which has been observed in the spectrum of the
solar corona during total eclipses of the sun. This star would seem to be
quite new, as there is no star in any of the catalogues in its position.
In September, 1877, it was examined with the spectroscope at Lord
Crawford's observatory, and its light was found to be almost entirely
monochromatic (of only one color), showing that the star "had changed into
a planetary nebula of small angular diameter" (!)
In August, 1885, a star of about seventh magnitude made its appearance
close to the nucleus of the Great Nebula in Andromeda--a well-known object
visible to the naked eye, and which has been well called "the Queen of the
Nebulæ." The new star was independently discovered by several observers
toward the end of August, but seems to have been first certainly seen by
Mr. T. W. Ward, of Belfast, on August 19, at 11 P.M. At Greenwich
observatory the spectrum of the new star was found "of precisely the same
character as that of the nebula, _i. e._, it was perfectly continuous, no
lines, either bright or dark, being visible, and the red end was wanting."
Dr. Huggins, however, on September 9, thought he could see from three to
five bright lines in its spectrum. The star gradually faded away, and on
February 7, 1886, was estimated only sixteenth magnitude in the 26 inch
refractor of the naval observatory at Washington. From a series of
measures by Prof. Asaph Hall he found "no certain indications of any
parallax," so that evidently the star and the nebula, in which it probably
lies, are situated at an immense distance from the earth. Prof. Seeliger
has investigated the decrease in light of the star on the hypothesis that
it was a cooling body, which had been suddenly raised to an intense heat
by the shock of a collision, and finds a fair agreement between theory and
observation. Anwers points out the similarity between this outburst and
the new star of 1860 in the cluster 80 Messier, and thinks it very
probable that both phenomena were due to physical changes in the nebulæ in
which they occurred.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account