Scientific American Supplement, No. 794, March 21, 1891 — John Shaqi
Scientific American Supplement, No. 794, March 21, 1891Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 794, March 21, 1891
Various
Science -- Periodicals
We now come to the application of high explosives to warfare in the
shape of bursting charges for shells. This is the latest phase of the
problem, and it is undoubtedly fraught with the most important
consequences to both attack and defense. Difficult as it has been to
obtain an exact estimate of the force of different explosives under
water, the problem is far greater out of the water and under the
ordinary conditions of shell fire; the principal obstacle being in the
fact that it is physically impossible to control the force of large
quantities in order to measure it, and small quantities give irregular
results. Theoretically, the matter has been accomplished by Berthelot,
the head of the French government "Commission of Explosives," by
calculating the volume of gas produced, heat developed, etc.; and this
method is excellent for obtaining a fair idea of the specific pressure
of any new explosive that may be brought forward, and determining
whether it is worth while to investigate it further; but the
explosives differ so much from each other in point of sensitiveness,
weight, physical condition, velocity of explosive wave, influence of
temperature and humidity, that we cannot determine from mere
theoretical considerations all that we would like to know. Various
methods of arriving at comparative values have been tried, but the
figures are very variable, as will be seen by the following tables.
Berthelot's commission, some ten years ago, exploded ten to thirty
grammes of each in 300 pound blocks of lead and measured the increased
size of the hole thus made. The relative result was:
No. 1 dynamite 1.0
Dry gun-cotton 1.17
Nitro-glycerine 1.20
Powder blew out and could not be measured.
Mr. R.C. Williams, at the Boston Institute of Technology, in the
winter of 1888 and 1889, tried the same method, but used six grammes
in forty-five pound blocks of lead. He obtained a relative result of--
No. 1 dynamite 1.0
Dry gun-cotton 1.37
Nitro-glycerine 2.51
Explosive gelatine 2.57
Forcite gelatine 2.7
Warm nitro-glycerine 2.7
Gunpowder 0.1
The powder gave great trouble in this case, also, by blowing out.
M. Chalon, a French engineer, obtained some years ago, with a small
mortar, firing a projectile of thirty kilos and using a charge of ten
grammes of each explosives, the following ranges:
Meters.
Blasting powder 2.6
No. 1 dynamite 31.4
Forcite of 75 per cent. N.G. 43.6
Blasting gelatine 45.0
Roux and Sarran obtained by experiments in bursting small bomb shells
the following comparative strengths of ranges:
Powder 1.0
Gun-cotton 6.5
Nitro-glycerine 10.0
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account