Scientific American Supplement, No. 794, March 21, 1891Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 794, March 21, 1891
Various
Science -- Periodicals
A large wheel increases the liability to bent axles in curving on
account of greater leverage unless the size and weight of the axle are
increased to correspond, and the wheel itself must be made stronger. A
four or six wheel truck will not retain its squareness and dependent
good riding qualities so well with 42 in. wheels as with 33 in. ones.
Besides the brakes, the pipes for air and steam under the cars
interfere with large wheels, and as a consequence of all this 42 in.
wheels have been replaced by 36 in. ones to some extent in some places
with satisfactory results. On one road in particular so strong is the
inclination away from large wheels that 30 in. is advocated as the
proper size for passenger cars.
On the other hand, there is no doubt a car wheel may be too small, for
the tires of small wheels probably do not get as much working up under
the rolls, and therefore are not as tough or homogeneous. Small wheels
are more destructive to frogs and rail joints. They revolve faster at
a given speed, and when below a certain size increase the liability to
hot journals if carrying the weight they can bear without detriment to
the rest of the wheel. Speed alone I am not willing to admit is the
most prolific source of hot boxes. The weight per square inch upon the
bearing is a very important factor. I have found by careful
examination of a great many cars that the number of hot boxes bears a
close relation to the weight per square inch on the journal and the
character of lubrication, and is not so much affected by the size of
wheel or speed. These observations were made upon 42 in., 36 in. and
33 in. wheels in the same trains. We find, furthermore, that while a
3-3/8 in. journal on a 33 in. wheel is apt to heat under our passenger
coaches, a 33/4 in., even when worn 3-5/8 in., journal on a 36 in. wheel
runs uniformly cool. In 1890 on one division there were about 180 hot
boxes with the small wheel, against 29 with the larger one, with a
preponderance of the latter size in service and cars of the same
weight over them.
I do not know that there is any more tendency for a large wheel to
slide than a small one under the action of the brakes, but large
wheels wear out more brake shoes than small ones, if there is any
difference in this particular.
My conclusions are that 42 in. is too large a diameter for steel
wheels in ordinary passenger service, and that 36 in. is right. But as
steel-tired wheels usually become 3 in. smaller in diameter before
wearing out, the wheel should be about 38 in. in diameter when new.
Such a wheel can be easily put under all passenger cars and will not
have become too small when worn out. A great many roads are using 36
in. wheels, but when their tires have lost 3 in. diameter they have
become 33 in. wheels, which I think too small.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account