Scientific American Supplement, No. 821, September 26, 1891Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 821, September 26, 1891
Various
Science -- Periodicals
(a.) Five grammes of a dextro-rotatory gum (No. 3 in table) were
dissolved in 20 c.c. of water. To the solution was added 90 c.c. of 95
per cent. alcohol. The white precipitate which formed was thrown on to a
tared filter and washed with 30 c.c. more alcohol. The total filtrate
therefore was 140 c.c. The precipitate was dried and weighed = 2.794
grammes or 55.88 per cent. of the total gum. The precipitate was then
redissolved in water, bleached as before and diluted to a 5 per cent.
solution. This was then examined in the polarimeter. Readings gave the
value [alpha]_{D} = +58.4°. The previous rotatory power of the gum was
+66°. Now the alcohol was driven off from the filtrate, which, allowing
for the 11.95 per cent. of water in the gum, should contain 32.17 per
cent. of gum. The alcohol-free liquid was then diluted to a known
volume (for 5 per cent, solution), and [alpha]_{J} found to be +57.7°.
This experiment was then repeated again, using 5 grammes of No. 3, when
3.5805 grammes of precipitate were obtained, using the same volumes of
alcohol and water. The precipitate gave [alpha]_{J} = +57.4°; the
filtrate treated as before, only the percentage of gum dissolved being
directly determined instead of being calculated by difference, gave
[alpha]_{J} = +52.5°.
(b.) Another gum (No. 9) with [alpha]_{J} = -38.2° and containing 13.86
per cent, of moisture, gave 2.3315 grms. of precipitate when similarly
treated. The precipitate gave when redissolved in water [alpha]_{J} =
-20.8°. The filtrate containing 39.5 per cent, real gum gave [alpha]_{J}
= -67.5°, so that the least lævo-rotatory gum. was precipitated by the
alcohol.
The Ghattis apparently are all lævo-rotatory, and give much less
alcoholic precipitates than the gum arabic. The precipitation moreover
was in the opposite direction, that is, the most lævo-rotatory gum was
thrown down by the alcohol. The appended table shows the nature of the
precipitates and the respective amounts from two Ghattis and two gum
arabics. It will be observed that the angle of rotation in three of the
cases is decidedly less both for precipitate and filtrate than for the
original solution:
SPECIFIC ROTATORY POWERS OF GUMS.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account