Scientific American, Vol. XXXIX.No. 6. [New Series.], August 10, 1878Various
Science
Scientific American, Vol. XXXIX.No. 6. [New Series.], August 10, 1878
Various
Science -- Periodicals; Technology -- Periodicals
When, with a powerful telescope, we return to the study of the sun's
surface, we meet a formidable difficulty which our first simple means
did not present. This arises from the nearly constant tremors of our own
atmosphere, through which we have to look. It is not that the tremor
does not exist with the smaller instrument, but now our higher
magnifying power exaggerates it, causes everything to appear unsteady
and blurry, however good the glass, and makes the same kind of trouble
for the eye which we should experience if we tried to read very fine
print across the top of a hot stove, whence columns of tremulous air
were rising. There is no remedy for this, unless it is assiduous
watching and infinite patience, for in almost every day there will come
one or more brief intervals, lasting sometimes minutes, sometimes only
seconds, during which the air seems momentarily tranquil. We must be on
the watch for hours, to seize these favorable moments, and, piecing
together what we have seen in them, in the course of time we obtain such
knowledge of the more curious features of the solar surface as we now
possess.
The eye aches after gazing for a minute steadily at the full moon, and
the sun's light is from 300,000 to 600,000 times brighter than full moon
light, while its heat is in still greater proportion. The object lens of
such a telescope as the equatorial at Allegheny is 13 inches in
diameter, and it is such light, and such heat, concentrated by it, that
we have to gaze on. The best contrivance so far found for diminishing
both, and without which our present acquaintance with the real
appearance and character of sunspots would not have been gained, depends
upon a curious property of light, discovered by a French physicist,
Malus, in the beginning of this century. Let A (Fig. 10) be a piece of
plane unsilvered glass, receiving the solar rays and reflecting them to
a second similar one, B, which itself reflects them again in the
direction C. Of course, since the glass is transparent, most of the rays
will pass through A, and not be reflected. Of those which reach B again
most will pass through, so that not a hundredth part of the original
beam reaches C. This then, is so far a gain; but of itself of little
use, since, such is the solar brilliancy, that even this small fraction
would, to an eye at C, appear blindingly bright. Now, if we rotate B
about the line joining it with A, keeping always the same reflecting
angle with it, it might naturally be supposed that the light would
merely be reflected in a new direction unchanged in quantity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account