Scotland under her early kings, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b a history of the kingdom to the close of the thirteenth century — John Shaqi
Scotland under her early kings, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b a history of the kingdom to the close of the thirteenth centuryRobertson, Eben William
History
Scotland under her early kings, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b a history of the kingdom to the close of the thirteenth century
Robertson, Eben William
Scotland -- History -- To 1603
The invariable Celtic principle of “division” is plainly traceable
amongst the population of Northern Britain in their separation
from a very early period into Caledones and Mæatæ, Dicaledones and
Vecturiones, and latterly into Northern and Southern Picts. Towards
the middle of the third century, when Dion wrote, the form of their
government was still “democratic;” in other words, the various states
or confederacies into which the Pictish people were divided, like the
early Gauls and Southern Britons, were still ignorant of the principle
of one elective or hereditary ruler.[31] The earliest bond of union
may probably be traced to the time when they united under one common
leader to resist or assail the Roman legionaries; and out of the _Dux_
or _Toshach_ elected for the occasion, like Galgacus, and exercising a
paramount though temporary authority, arose the _Ardrigh_ or supreme
king, after some popular or ambitious chieftain had prolonged his power
by successful wars, or procured his election to this prominent station
for life. The nature of the sovereignty thus established, which was
fully recognised in the days of Columba, resembled the dominion of the
Ardrigh amongst the kindred Gael of Ireland, or of the Unben amongst
the earlier Cymri, differing in a remarkable manner from the royal
authority as it existed amongst the Welsh of a later age. _Breith_,
or _Law_, was at the root of the later Welsh system. Privilege was
_Breint_, the noble or man of privilege amongst the Southern Welsh,
_Breyr_; the king, _Breen-hyn_--the senior _Brehon_ or _Lawgiver_, the
hereditary instead of the elective _Vergobreith_. In the laws of Howel
Dha, the representative of the Druid, or of the noble enrolled amongst
the Druids, the _Cynghellwr_ who “divided with the _Brenin_” evidently
took precedence of the _Maer_, the representative of the military
noble; whilst the _Rhy_, and _Twysawg_, or _Rex_ and _Dux_ (though met
with in the Welsh dictionaries), are never found in these laws. With
the Gael, however, it was the _Righ_ and the _Toshach_ who were most
prominent; the _Brehon_ had no such intimate connection with the throne
or with the privileged classes, and in the charter of king Robert Bruce
to the Thane of Cawdor, it was the _Judex_ who held his lands under
the Thane or _Toshach_. The Gaelic _Ardrigh_ represented the permanent
_Toshach_, not the _Vergobreith_, the permanent holder of the office
of _Vercingetorix_, the head of a wide confederacy bound together less
by the ties of blood, or by an authority confirmed by the sacerdotal
order, than by the actual power of the supreme ruler confirmed by the
exaction of hostages.[32]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account